Over on the print side of the newspaper, we published a version this morning of my discussion of George Will's Sunday column on global cooling, etc:

There is an old canard of the political debate around climate change that goes something like this: How can scientists be believed about global warming today when back in the 1970s they predicted global cooling?

The argument, reprised in Sunday's Journal by syndicated columnist George Will, sounds reasonable, and gets good traction in the political debate.

It is wrong. 

What are you thoughts?