This morning's Internet reading includes two entries from thinkers I respect a great deal on central questions regarding the two biggest policy questions on our plates right now: energy/climate and health care. Click through for links.

• In this morning's Journal, Win Quigley ever-so-carefully suggests that the success or failure of health care policy is up to you: "It might be asking too much of a nation that seems addicted to bromides, sound bites and bumper stickers to do the heavy lifting citizenship requires. At least doing our jobs as citizens in the United States isn't fatal. There are a lot of Iranians who would like that."
• At Energy Collective, economist John Whitehead (the scourge of the left for his critique of the "green jobs" argument) reminds that we're having this cap-and-trade discussion for a reason: "Any discussion of the costs of cap-and-trade should be contrasted with the benefits of cap-and-trade in order to get a complete picture of the policy. Most economic analyses suggest that getting busy about climate is a fairly good idea."
• Bean couners at the CBO have run the numbers, and concluded that the annual cost of the Waxman-Markey cap-and-trade bill per household is less than a few months' cable bill.
• Tesla, the electric car company we love to hate because of the way it threw us over for the glamour of California, is going to be profitable in a couple of months. Or at least, so says Elon Musk. (I'll just remind you Musk told us he loved us, too, and would never leave us if we'd just build him that water line.)