Login for full access to ABQJournal.com
 
Remember Me for a Month
Recover lost username/password
Register for username

New users: Subscribe here


Close

N.M. Science

A science & weather blog by John Fleck

 Print  Email this pageEmail   Comments   Share   Tweet   + 1

Is the purposes of nuclear deterrence really to reassure ourselves?

Is the purpose of our nuclear arsenal really to deter our hypothetical enemies, or reassure ourselves? Jeffrey Lewis, of the James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies:

I once sat in on a meeting at the Pentagon where a friend and colleague gave a senior official a very tough time over how, precisely, a small reduction in the reliability of warheads might change the calculations of an adversary. Even if the Russians knew our nuclear warheads were “only” 70 or 80 percent reliable, my friend pressed, how would this alter Russian calculations? Why don’t we insist on equally high reliability standards for missiles? My colleague’s incredibly persistent questioning produced an interesting response. The senior official argued that the problem was not deterrence, per se, but self-deterrence. We would be less confident in a crisis, he thought, if we didn’t have some I once sat in on a meeting at the Pentagon where a friend and colleague gave a senior official a very tough time over how, precisely, a small reduction in the reliability of warheads might change the calculations of an adversary. Even if the Russians knew our nuclear warheads were “only” 70 or 80 percent reliable, my friend pressed, how would this alter Russian calculations? Why don’t we insist on equally high reliability standards for missiles? My colleague’s incredibly persistent questioning produced an interesting response. The senior official argued that the problem was not deterrence, per se, but self-deterrence. We would be less confident in a crisis, he thought, if we didn’t have some undefined faith in our nuclear stockpile. It was the closest I have ever seen a senior U.S. official to admitting that much of what passes for “deterrence” is about self-assurance. faith in our nuclear stockpile. It was the closest I have ever seen a senior U.S. official to admitting that much of what passes for “deterrence” is about self-assurance.

The full article is worth your click, and more of Lewis’s writing can be found here.

Reprint story
-- Email the reporter at jfleck@abqjournal.com. Call the reporter at 505-823-3916

Comments

Note: Readers can use their Facebook identity for online comments or can use Hotmail, Yahoo or AOL accounts via the "Comment using" pulldown menu. You may send a news tip or an anonymous comment directly to the reporter, click here.

More in New Mexico Science
History of Sandia Labs: March 13 talk in Los Alamos

The terrifically interesting Rebecca Ullrich (a nuclear historian who's helped me with stories in the past) will be speaking next...

Close