Story Tools
 E-mail Story
 Print Friendly

Send E-mail
To Adam Rankin


BY Recent stories
by Adam Rankin

$$ NewsLibrary Archives search for
Adam Rankin
'95-now

Reprint story













LANL

  • Beating Not Tied to LANL, Police Say (06-10-05)

  • Accounts of Man's Beating Differ (06-10-05)

  • Strip Club Stories Vary For Auditor (06-08-05)

  • Lab Whistle-Blower Beaten (06-07-05)

  • LANL Worker, Blogger Retiring (06-03-05)

  • Preserving Homestead Heritage (05-29-05)

  • Lockheed Adds Partners to LANL Bid (05-28-05)

  • Gov. Urges LANL Employees to Hang On (05-28-05)

  • UC to Fight for Lab Contract (05-27-05)

  • UC Moves Closer to a Bid for LANL (05-26-05)

  • LANL, UC-San Diego Join Forces for Degree (05-23-05)

  • LANL Critic Whistled Before (02-13-05)

  • Lab Auditor Claims Retaliation (02-10-05)

  • LANL Sees Budget Hike; Sandia Funds Drop (02-10-05)

  • LANL Boss, Security Under Attack (02-09-05)

  • Guest Opinion: LANL Workers Will Get Benefits (02-06-05)

  • Missing Journals Had Column Critical of LANL (02-05-05)

  • Lab Gets Funds To Go 'Medialess' (02-02-05)

  • Blog a Forum for LANL Workers (01-31-05)

  • Comments on Draft Lab Contract Go to Agency (01-30-05)

  • 'Missing LANL Disks Weren't (01-29-05)

  • Beryllium Found at Lab (01-21-05)

  • Lawmakers Echo LANL Employees' Concerns (01-25-05)

  • Regular Activities To Resume at LANL (01-22-05)

  • UC May Have LANL Bid Partner (01-21-05)

  • DOE Nominee Wants Lab Benefits To Stay (01-20-05)

  • Anti-Nuke Groups May Bid on LANL Contract (01-20-05)

  • LANL Workers Threaten Exodus (01-18-05)

  • Lab Employees Organize (01-18-05)

  • Lab Waste Flows Restricted (01-15-05)

  • Chancellor To Recommend UT Not Pursue Contract (01-14-05)

  • Shutdown Cost Review Sought (01-12-05)

  • Lab's Management Criteria Change (01-10-05)

  • LANL Impact Under DOE Review (01-08-05)

  • LANL May Lose Task to Sandia Labs (01-08-05)

  • More Time Given for Comments on Management Criteria (01-07-05)

  • FBI Completes Investigation of Missing Disks (01-07-05)

  • Bingaman Wants Comments Deadline Extended (01-06-05)

  • Lab Awards Nearly $800,000 in Contracts (01-02-05)

  • Lab's Nuke Waste Transfer on Track (12-27-04)

  • LANL Disputes DOE Report on Particle Accelerator (12-26-04)

  • Lab Facility's Future Uncertain With Move of Nukes (12-26-04)

  • Lab Managers Wanted Fraud Report Held, Official Says (10-16-04)

  • LANL Employees' Jobs Guaranteed (10-02-04)

  • Nanos Creating a Climate of Fear (08-11-04 guest commentary)

  • LANL Retirees Voice Anger, Anguish (08-08-04)

  • LANL Improvements Can't Wait (07-25-04 guest commentary)

  • LANL Restrictions Now Nationwide (07-24-04)

  • Lab Worker Aided FBI in Theft Case (05-30-04)

  • Scientist Wants To Rank LANL Waste (05-09-04)

  • Paying Too Much for a Bad Machine (04-18-04 guest commentary)

  • Lab's Temps To Go Permanent (03-17-04)

  • LANL's Nuke Site Standing Solidified (03-14-04)

  • Group: Suit Causes Labs To Cut Support (02-12-04)

  • Lab Says Spending Controlled (01-25-04)

  • LANL Losing Cleanup Funds (01-22-04)

  • LANL Needs To Face Reforms (01-18-04 guest commentary)

  • LANL Sued on Pay Rates (01-07-04)

  • DOE To Take Bids for LANL Contract (04-30-03)

  • LANL Zinged on Computer Security (04-29-03)

  • Gov., Senators Urge Delay of LANL-U.C. Decision (04-26-03)

  • Domenici Backs Bidding for LANL Contract (04-23-03)

  • DOE Slams Lab Report on 2001 Accident (03-26-03)

  • Ex-Lab Official Stunned by Move (03-25-03)

  • LANL Audits Chief Leaving (03-14-03)

  • LANL Officials Defend Firings (03-13-03)

  • LANL No 'Den of Thieves,' Ex-Official Says (03-13-03)

  • LANL Security Chief, Deputy To Leave Lab (03-11-03)

  • Several Lab Workers Say They Were Slandered in Testimony (03-08-03)

  • LANL Managers Brace for Congressional Grilling (03-07-03)

  • Keep UC Running LANL, Richardson Says (03-01-03)

  • LANL Deputy Did Not Resign (02-28-03)

  • Testimony on LANL Called Outrageous (02-27-03)

  • Clock Running Out for LANL (02-23-03)

  • Secret Witness To Be at LANL Hearing (02-20-03)

  • LANL Petitioners Support UC Management (02-19-03)

  • Lab Employees Want UC To Stay (02-15-03)

  • 96% of Lab Purchases Reconciled, UC Auditor Says (02-11-03)

  • 2 Get New LANL Jobs (02-06-03)

  • Lab Fraud Put U.S. at Risk, Officials Say

  • DOE Report Slams Lab Managers (01-31-03)

  • DOE Report on Lab Fair, Congressional Delegates Say (01-31-03)

  • DOE Calls Firing of Whistleblowers "Incomprehensible" (01-30-03)

  • DOE Denies Retribution in Suspension of LANL Nuke Safety Officer (01-30-03)

  • Lab Vendors Losing Sales (01-29-03)

  • LANL Wants To Gain Employees' Trust (01-28-03)

  • 2 LANL Workers To Stay in Jobs (01-25-03)

  • California Lab Faces Scrutiny Amid LANL Problems (01-24-03)

  • LANL Business Division Restructured (01-24-03)

  • Lab Boss Backs Rehiring Sleuths (01-21-03)

  • University Rehires LANL Sleuths (01-18-03)

  • LANL Says it May Have Lost Hard Drive (01-17-03)

  • LANL Boss To 'Drain the Swamp' (01-16-03)

  • LANL's Head of Audits Reassigned (01-11-03)

  • No Pay Cuts Came With Lab Demotions (01-10-03)

  • University of Calif. Names Lab Oversight VP (01-09-03)

  • LANL Security Managers Demoted (01-08-03)

  • 'Lab Could've Been Heroes,' Fired Security Worker Says (01-05-03)

  • Many LANL Purchases Unreconciled (01-04-03)

  • LANL Shakeup -- Top 2 Managers Quit (01-03-03)

  • Director's Tenure Was Turbulent (01-03-03)

  • LANL Changes Draw Congressional Reaction (01-02-03)

  • LANL Director Browne Resigns (01-02-03)

  • Text of John Browne's Resignation Letter (01-02-03)

  • U.S. Senator Sets Sights on LANL (12-12-02)

  • Lab E-Mail Backtracks Order To Provide Documents (12-12-02)

  • Lab Told To Clean Up Its Act (12-11-02)

  • LANL Wants Copies of Probe Papers (12-10-02)

  • U.S. House Latest To Probe LANL (12-09-02)

  • Tracking Lab Property Not Easy (12-08-02)

  • Labor Dept. Finds for Mid-'90s Lab Whistle-Blower (12-06-02)

  • Lab Says It's Out to Find Fraud (12-05-02)

  • Charges Not New to LANL (12-04-02)

  • University Won't 'Tolerate' LANL Theft (11-23-02)

  • Lab Staff Lax on Purchase Reports (11-22-02)

  • Another $723,000 in Items Missing (11-21-02)

  • DOE Team Arrives To Probe Lab Problems (11-19-02)

  • $3 Million of LANL Items 'Lost' (11-17-02)

  • Missing LANL Items High-Tech Devices (11-17-02)

  • LANL Official Announces Resignation (11-09-02)

  • LANL Probe Targets Workers (11-06-02)

  • Official LANL site

    Journal North
     
    Home
     Sports
     Opinion
     Entertainment



    More North


  • Journal North:  Home | Sports | Opinion | Obits | Entertainment

              Front Page  north




    Lab Problems Don't Affect CDC Project

    By Adam Rankin
    Journal Staff Writer
        POJOAQUE— A work stand-down at Los Alamos National Laboratory hasn't affected a historical document retrieval project aimed at determining how much pollution has been released by the nuclear weapons lab in its 60 years of existence, according to U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention officials.
        Charles Miller, chief of radiation studies for the CDC, said the work shutdown at LANL occurred just as the CDC is looking to fill a new five-year contract to complete the document retrieval project.
        "The current issues at Los Alamos are having just about no impact on CDC's effort," he said. "Our work has stopped, but fortunately, we're not in the middle of anything major right now."
        Miller and several other CDC officials were here on Tuesday night to discuss the future of the Los Alamos Historical Document Retrieval and Assessment project.
        Miller and his colleagues also passed out an interim report detailing the status of the project, which is designed to identify and prioritize chemical and radioactive releases that likely had the greatest impact on neighboring communities and people.
        CDC will use the study to decide whether it should reconstruct public exposures to chemicals and radioactivity released by the laboratory over the years.
        Begun in 1999, the project is taking much longer than anticipated. The original $4.1 million contract, held by ChemRisk, expired at the end of June with about half of the relevant documents still unreviewed.
        Documents that aren't classified are being copied and placed in an electronic database for the public to access and review.
        Until March, when CDC announced the project would continue, its future was in question, in part because CDC and the laboratory disagreed over access to various documents.
        "We just were not getting very far, very fast," Miller said.
        But in the last six months, with help from the Department of Energy and LANL, CDC and its contractor have been "getting access to documents, we were not getting access to a year ago," Miller said.