Story Tools
 E-mail Story
 Print Friendly

Send E-mail
To Adam Rankin


BY Recent stories
by Adam Rankin

$$ NewsLibrary Archives search for
Adam Rankin
'95-now

Reprint story













LANL

  • Beating Not Tied to LANL, Police Say (06-10-05)

  • Accounts of Man's Beating Differ (06-10-05)

  • Strip Club Stories Vary For Auditor (06-08-05)

  • Lab Whistle-Blower Beaten (06-07-05)

  • LANL Worker, Blogger Retiring (06-03-05)

  • Preserving Homestead Heritage (05-29-05)

  • Lockheed Adds Partners to LANL Bid (05-28-05)

  • Gov. Urges LANL Employees to Hang On (05-28-05)

  • UC to Fight for Lab Contract (05-27-05)

  • UC Moves Closer to a Bid for LANL (05-26-05)

  • LANL, UC-San Diego Join Forces for Degree (05-23-05)

  • LANL Critic Whistled Before (02-13-05)

  • Lab Auditor Claims Retaliation (02-10-05)

  • LANL Sees Budget Hike; Sandia Funds Drop (02-10-05)

  • LANL Boss, Security Under Attack (02-09-05)

  • Guest Opinion: LANL Workers Will Get Benefits (02-06-05)

  • Missing Journals Had Column Critical of LANL (02-05-05)

  • Lab Gets Funds To Go 'Medialess' (02-02-05)

  • Blog a Forum for LANL Workers (01-31-05)

  • Comments on Draft Lab Contract Go to Agency (01-30-05)

  • 'Missing LANL Disks Weren't (01-29-05)

  • Beryllium Found at Lab (01-21-05)

  • Lawmakers Echo LANL Employees' Concerns (01-25-05)

  • Regular Activities To Resume at LANL (01-22-05)

  • UC May Have LANL Bid Partner (01-21-05)

  • DOE Nominee Wants Lab Benefits To Stay (01-20-05)

  • Anti-Nuke Groups May Bid on LANL Contract (01-20-05)

  • LANL Workers Threaten Exodus (01-18-05)

  • Lab Employees Organize (01-18-05)

  • Lab Waste Flows Restricted (01-15-05)

  • Chancellor To Recommend UT Not Pursue Contract (01-14-05)

  • Shutdown Cost Review Sought (01-12-05)

  • Lab's Management Criteria Change (01-10-05)

  • LANL Impact Under DOE Review (01-08-05)

  • LANL May Lose Task to Sandia Labs (01-08-05)

  • More Time Given for Comments on Management Criteria (01-07-05)

  • FBI Completes Investigation of Missing Disks (01-07-05)

  • Bingaman Wants Comments Deadline Extended (01-06-05)

  • Lab Awards Nearly $800,000 in Contracts (01-02-05)

  • Lab's Nuke Waste Transfer on Track (12-27-04)

  • LANL Disputes DOE Report on Particle Accelerator (12-26-04)

  • Lab Facility's Future Uncertain With Move of Nukes (12-26-04)

  • Lab Managers Wanted Fraud Report Held, Official Says (10-16-04)

  • LANL EMPLOYEES' JOBS GUARANTEED
    (10-02-04)

  • Nanos Creating a Climate of Fear (08-11-04 guest commentary)

  • LANL Retirees Voice Anger, Anguish (08-08-04)

  • LANL Improvements Can't Wait (07-25-04 guest commentary)

  • LANL Restrictions Now Nationwide (07-24-04)

  • Lab Worker Aided FBI in Theft Case (05-30-04)

  • Scientist Wants To Rank LANL Waste (05-09-04)

  • Paying Too Much for a Bad Machine (04-18-04 guest commentary)

  • Lab's Temps To Go Permanent (03-17-04)

  • LANL's Nuke Site Standing Solidified (03-14-04)

  • Group: Suit Causes Labs To Cut Support (02-12-04)

  • Lab Says Spending Controlled (01-25-04)

  • LANL Losing Cleanup Funds (01-22-04)

  • LANL Needs To Face Reforms (01-18-04 guest commentary)

  • LANL Sued on Pay Rates (01-07-04)

  • DOE To Take Bids for LANL Contract (04-30-03)

  • LANL Zinged on Computer Security (04-29-03)

  • Gov., Senators Urge Delay of LANL-U.C. Decision (04-26-03)

  • Domenici Backs Bidding for LANL Contract (04-23-03)

  • DOE Slams Lab Report on 2001 Accident (03-26-03)

  • Ex-Lab Official Stunned by Move (03-25-03)

  • LANL Audits Chief Leaving (03-14-03)

  • LANL Officials Defend Firings (03-13-03)

  • LANL No 'Den of Thieves,' Ex-Official Says (03-13-03)

  • LANL Security Chief, Deputy To Leave Lab (03-11-03)

  • Several Lab Workers Say They Were Slandered in Testimony (03-08-03)

  • LANL Managers Brace for Congressional Grilling (03-07-03)

  • Keep UC Running LANL, Richardson Says (03-01-03)

  • LANL Deputy Did Not Resign (02-28-03)

  • Testimony on LANL Called Outrageous (02-27-03)

  • Clock Running Out for LANL (02-23-03)

  • Secret Witness To Be at LANL Hearing (02-20-03)

  • LANL Petitioners Support UC Management (02-19-03)

  • Lab Employees Want UC To Stay (02-15-03)

  • 96% of Lab Purchases Reconciled, UC Auditor Says (02-11-03)

  • 2 Get New LANL Jobs (02-06-03)

  • Lab Fraud Put U.S. at Risk, Officials Say

  • DOE Report Slams Lab Managers (01-31-03)

  • DOE Report on Lab Fair, Congressional Delegates Say (01-31-03)

  • DOE Calls Firing of Whistleblowers "Incomprehensible" (01-30-03)

  • DOE Denies Retribution in Suspension of LANL Nuke Safety Officer (01-30-03)

  • Lab Vendors Losing Sales (01-29-03)

  • LANL Wants To Gain Employees' Trust (01-28-03)

  • 2 LANL Workers To Stay in Jobs (01-25-03)

  • California Lab Faces Scrutiny Amid LANL Problems (01-24-03)

  • LANL Business Division Restructured (01-24-03)

  • Lab Boss Backs Rehiring Sleuths (01-21-03)

  • University Rehires LANL Sleuths (01-18-03)

  • LANL Says it May Have Lost Hard Drive (01-17-03)

  • LANL Boss To 'Drain the Swamp' (01-16-03)

  • LANL's Head of Audits Reassigned (01-11-03)

  • No Pay Cuts Came With Lab Demotions (01-10-03)

  • University of Calif. Names Lab Oversight VP (01-09-03)

  • LANL Security Managers Demoted (01-08-03)

  • 'Lab Could've Been Heroes,' Fired Security Worker Says (01-05-03)

  • Many LANL Purchases Unreconciled (01-04-03)

  • LANL Shakeup -- Top 2 Managers Quit (01-03-03)

  • Director's Tenure Was Turbulent (01-03-03)

  • LANL Changes Draw Congressional Reaction (01-02-03)

  • LANL Director Browne Resigns (01-02-03)

  • Text of John Browne's Resignation Letter (01-02-03)

  • U.S. Senator Sets Sights on LANL (12-12-02)

  • Lab E-Mail Backtracks Order To Provide Documents (12-12-02)

  • Lab Told To Clean Up Its Act (12-11-02)

  • LANL Wants Copies of Probe Papers (12-10-02)

  • U.S. House Latest To Probe LANL (12-09-02)

  • Tracking Lab Property Not Easy (12-08-02)

  • Labor Dept. Finds for Mid-'90s Lab Whistle-Blower (12-06-02)

  • Lab Says It's Out to Find Fraud (12-05-02)

  • Charges Not New to LANL (12-04-02)

  • University Won't 'Tolerate' LANL Theft (11-23-02)

  • Lab Staff Lax on Purchase Reports (11-22-02)

  • Another $723,000 in Items Missing (11-21-02)

  • DOE Team Arrives To Probe Lab Problems (11-19-02)

  • $3 Million of LANL Items 'Lost' (11-17-02)

  • Missing LANL Items High-Tech Devices (11-17-02)

  • LANL Official Announces Resignation (11-09-02)

  • LANL Probe Targets Workers (11-06-02)

  • Official LANL site

    Journal North
     
    Home
     Sports
     Opinion
     Entertainment



    More North


  • Journal North:  Home | Sports | Opinion | Obits | Entertainment

              Front Page  north




    LANL Employees' Jobs Guaranteed

    By Adam Rankin
    Journal Staff Writer
        The National Nuclear Security Administration confirmed Friday in writing what it has promised for more than a year: Employees of Los Alamos National Laboratory are guaranteed their jobs, benefits and retirement, no matter who wins the upcoming competition to run the weapons lab.
        Shortly after Energy Secretary Spencer Abraham announced the LANL contract would be put up for competitive bidding in April 2003, he made the verbal commitment that employees at the laboratory would not lose the benefits and retirement plan offered by the University of California. The UC contract to run LANL expires Sept. 30, 2005. The university has run LANL since 1943 and has never had to compete for the contract.
        Now Abraham's promise is in writing.
        According to the "Formal Acquisition Plan," a new operator must commit to "offer employment to all personnel employed by UC at LANL, with the exception of those senior management individuals identified by the offeror, at comparable compensation packages," according to the plan.
        Employees will get "a pension plan that maintains the benefit accrual terms and conditions of the current UC pension plan," and can apply their years of service under UC to the new employer.
        For those belonging to LANL's union, the University Professional and Technical Employees union, they are guaranteed the new operator "must any certified collective bargaining agents and their existing bargaining agreements."
        Past union president and recently retired LANL employee Betty Gunther said she is pleased with the wording, even though the union doesn't yet have a collective bargaining agreement in place.
        Formed in 1997 and officially recognized by LANL in 2000, the union hasn't held an employee election to gain an agreement yet, she said.
        She said employees will feel relieved about the requirement that a new contractor must keep current LANL employees and their benefits.
        "They will feel less in danger," she said. "Everybody figured they had to retire to save their retirement."
        NNSA, the federal agency that oversees LANL, included in the plan released Friday an outline for how it intends to conduct the upcoming competition and included some of the requirements it expects the next operator of the nuclear weapons lab to meet.
        Without getting into specifics, the plan simply states the next operator will be expected to safeguard nuclear materials and information, recruit the best staff and scientists, and maintain vigorous research and development and a "creative scientific culture."
        NNSA also announced in the plan that it expects to have a draft request for proposals on the competition to run Los Alamos National Laboratory by the middle of this month.
        It also plans to make a final decision on the competition by July 1, 2005, so the next operator will have three months to transition to full control of the weapons laboratory when the current contract held by the University of California expires Sept. 30, 2005.
        NNSA will release the draft request for proposals within a few weeks and provide a 30-day comment period, during which NNSA will meet with companies and institutions that have expressed interest in running LANL.
        Since Abraham announced that the LANL contract would be put out for competition, potential bidders have been awaiting the document that will lay out what the government expects of the next laboratory manager.
        While the university operates the laboratory under a contract, the agreement has been added to and modified over the years. And because the LANL contract has never been offered for competition before, NNSA and DOE have never had to put into a proposal all that LANL does and what the government expects future operators to do.