In defense of the proposed Albuquerque gasoline tax - Albuquerque Journal

In defense of the proposed Albuquerque gasoline tax

The recent op-ed by the Rio Grande Foundation about the proposed municipal gas tax contains several points and distortions that merit clarification and response.

1) “The proposed gas tax adds 2 cents per gallon onto the combined state and federal 35.4-cent tax.”

The proposed tax will bring the total tax for gasoline in Albuquerque to 39.28 cents per gallon, significantly lower than the national average of 49.50 cents per gallon.

2) “The well-off can easily afford a 2-cent tax due to their additional wealth and ability to buy new, efficient cars, but the disadvantaged must pay the same tax while earning less and filling their tanks more.”

It is true that lower-income families cannot afford the newest cars, however the used-car market includes many fuel-efficient vehicles. The proposed increase is minimal and worth the improvements that would be made to city roads and related improvements to our quality of life. As of 2017 it is estimated that American drivers use on average 656 gallons of gasoline per person per year. If we assume two adult drivers per household, the proposed tax of 2 cents would increase household gasoline cost by only $26.24.

3) “A gas tax would also have negative effects on Albuquerque’s economy.”

The tax would actually have a positive effect on Albuquerque’s economy in that an addition of at least $4.8 million each year would be available for road construction projects, not accounting for potential of bonding larger projects using the revenue. This would create jobs for city businesses and workers, with additional construction sector-related revenue for the city. Those workers in turn would spend their earnings, creating even more retail sector business.

4) “As the ordinance is written, the tax would be used to ‘rehabilitate transportation systems.’ This could mean directly supporting or allowing existing dollars to be diverted to the controversial Albuquerque Rapid Transit program and city bus system.”

As I’ve repeatedly stated, it was never my intent that the revenues generated be used for any portion of the current rapid transit project. Rather, it is intended that it be used for non-ART-related road rehabilitation projects in accordance with our Complete Streets policy in areas throughout Albuquerque that are in great need of such improvement. I intend to amend the language of the proposal to specifically disallow use of the tax revenues for the ART project.

5) “…much of the revenue will be allocated to ‘outdated’ roadways that are functional but for some reason or another are not compliant with the federal Americans With Disabilities Act. … Adding a new tax onto the backs of local motorists now in order to comply with a law passed back in 1990 is ridiculous.”

It was certainly my intent that a portion of the municipal gas tax revenues be used to rehabilitate roads, sidewalks, etc. to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act in conjunction with critical road, streetscape and paving modernization unrelated to the ADA, as required by federal law. It is prudent, not ridiculous, to accelerate our present compliance with the ADA, since non-compliance exposes the city and taxpayers to civil legal liability for not ensuring persons with disabilities are protected from discrimination. Non-compliance could also compromise our ability to receive state and federal highway grants.

6) “Even if the proceeds were dedicated specifically to roads, it is worth questioning what the city will receive in terms of ‘bang for the buck.’ That’s because a significant portion of the money generated by the tax will be spent on the creation of a collection and auditing apparatus.”

The city will need to hire three full-time employees for collection and auditing of the revenues, as well as equipping them with the necessary tools to do so. A fiscal analysis estimates the annual amount of these administrative functions is $228,336 for the first year and $186,300 per year thereafter, amounting to only 4.7 percent of total collections at most.

Home » Opinion » Guest Columns » In defense of the proposed Albuquerque gasoline tax

Insert Question Legislature form in Legis only stories

Albuquerque Journal and its reporters are committed to telling the stories of our community.

• Do you have a question you want someone to try to answer for you? Do you have a bright spot you want to share?
   We want to hear from you. Please email

taboola desktop

ABQjournal can get you answers in all pages


Questions about the Legislature?
Albuquerque Journal can get you answers
Email addresses are used solely for verification and to speed the verification process for repeat questioners.
University of Wisconsin project seeks closure for New Mexico ...
ABQnews Seeker
Raoul Zavala was not supposed to ... Raoul Zavala was not supposed to be on the plane that day. ...
A Craigslist ad led these locals to start a ...
ABQnews Seeker
Food is Free Albuquerque will begin ... Food is Free Albuquerque will begin its Farm and Orchard Gleaning Project in June
Experts urge caution for recreation on the Rio Grande. ...
ABQnews Seeker
In Corrales, fire and police officials ... In Corrales, fire and police officials have done 29 rescues of people and dogs stranded on the river between Siphon Beach and Alameda — ...
Man charged after fatally shooting girlfriend
ABQnews Seeker
After the death of his 18-year-old ... After the death of his 18-year-old girlfriend in a Saturday-night shooting, Carlos Gonzalez, 24, wasand charged with 2nd degree murder.
Rick Wright: First visit to Unser Racing Museum on ...
ABQnews Seeker
Until Friday, some 18 years after ... Until Friday, some 18 years after it opened and three days before its permanent closing, I'd never visited Albuquerque's Unser Racing Museum. Now, I ...
Pet care: Cat missing the litter pan isn't bad ...
ABQnews Seeker
Q: Our family has a 19-year-old ... Q: Our family has a 19-year-old "Heinz 57 variety" female cat who has taken to urinating outside her ...
$35M apartment complex breaks ground in Albuquerque's Northeast Heights
ABQnews Seeker
Titan Development broke ground on Tuesday ... Titan Development broke ground on Tuesday on a 105-unit apartment building in the Northeast Heights. The $35 million project, at 6925 Alameda NE, is ...
Talk of the Town: UNM grads, FEMA, Mark Ronchetti ...
From the newspaper
OPINION: Journal May 17 editorial about ... OPINION: Journal May 17 editorial about Farmington mass shooting should have taken a stand in favor of stricter gun laws.
SunZia will transform NM economy, transition 3M homes
From the newspaper
The largest renewable energy project in ... The largest renewable energy project in America will start right here in New Mexico, and it just received a key approval from the Bureau ...