In making a case for her plan to resurrect the straight party voting option in New Mexico, Secretary of State Maggie Toulouse Oliver says it makes it much easier for voters of all stripes to cast a ballot. (Straight party voting allows voters to check a single box to vote for a major party’s entire slate of candidates.)
“The reality of straight party voting,” Toulouse Oliver said in a guest column in the Journal last week, “is that more voters will be able to participate in the voting process, and the process itself will be quicker and easier.”
OK. But if Toulouse Oliver’s primary goal is simply to make voting easier, and by easier she means faster, then why not just allow voters to sign a proxy handing their ballots over to the political party of their choice to vote as party officials see fit? Sure, that’s a little over the top, but it’s effectively what the straight party option does. So if speed is the name of the game, then that’s the way to go in Toulouse Oliver’s world.
But for anyone who actually cares about having an informed electorate, straight party voting is a terrible idea. Voting in this country is a sacred right and a responsibility, and it’s not too much to ask voters to consider each race on the ballot. They can still vote for every Democrat or every Republican if they so choose, but they should consider each race. Individual candidates and their stances on issues matter.