Assessment of LANL Rad Lab premature, incomplete - Albuquerque Journal

Assessment of LANL Rad Lab premature, incomplete

On Feb. 22, the National Nuclear Security Administration released a draft environmental assessment for the Radiological Laboratory Utility and Office Building (a.k.a. “Rad Lab”) at the Los Alamos National Laboratory. This is pursuant to requirements under the National Environmental Policy Act to provide the public with an opportunity to review and comment on major federal proposals. The comment period closed on April 25.

NNSA’s proposal is to re-categorize the Rad Lab as a Hazard Category-3 nuclear facility so that it can raise ten-fold the amount of plutonium used there from 38.6 grams of plutonium-239 to 400 grams. NNSA claims that the proposal’s only purpose is to maintain materials characterization and analytical chemistry capabilities for plutonium at LANL.

This involves transferring those operations out of the old, deteriorating Chemistry and Metallurgy Research (CMR) Building to the Rad Lab and its neighboring plutonium pit production facility, PF-4.

Re-categorizing the Rad Lab as a Hazard Category-3 nuclear facility is just one of four construction subprojects at the Rad Lab and PF-4 that relocate analytical chemistry and materials characterization operations; together, they cost $2 billion.

Even though the draft Rad Lab environmental assessment lists various “reasonably foreseeable actions” that will affect LANL in the future, it completely fails to mention expanded production of plutonium pits, the cores of nuclear weapons.

That omission is absurd (intentional?), since expanded pit production is far more than just foreseeable – it is statutorily required by the FY 2015 Defense Authorization Act and is being actively planned for.

The independent, congressionally commissioned Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board recognizes this, and calls it for what it is. One of its weekly reports from 2015 refers to infrastructure projects connected to replacing the old CMR Building, including two that “primarily support the increased capacity required for larger pit manufacturing rates.”

To top it off, the draft Rad Lab environmental assessment is grossly premature.

It has been widely reported that NNSA will announce on May 11 where future plutonium pit production will take place, either at LANL or the Savannah River Site in South Carolina, or both.

It is absurd that NNSA started the environmental assessment process before that decision, which could render re-categorization of the Rad Lab to a Hazard Category-3 nuclear facility unnecessary to begin with.

More narrowly, some of the Rad Lab environmental assessment’s specific deficiencies are:

⋄  It lacks any consideration of toxic beryllium risks, when the FY 2019 NNSA budget says that beryllium analysis will be a new capability at the Rad Lab. Beryllium is a light metal used in materials research, defense systems and testing at LANL that in powdered form and airborne can be highly toxic.

⋄  Contrary to stated Department of Energy National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) policy, there is no analysis of the possibility of “intentional destructive acts,” defined as sabotage or terrorism, including intentional airplane crashes, that could damage the facility.

• The draft Rad Lab environmental assessment explains away safety and seismic concerns based on “preliminary” analyses. That’s not good enough. Safety and seismic concerns should be resolved through completed, peer-reviewed analyses.

Finally, if NNSA decides on May 11 to conduct expanded plutonium pit production at the Savannah River Site, or perhaps LANL as well, then a nationwide programmatic environmental impact statement (PEIS) will be required.

In any event, NNSA is required to produce a new or supplemental PEIS to raise the current 20 pits per year cap on pit production that has been in place since 1996. Ironically, the plan to increase future pit production to 80 pits a year is not intended just to keep the existing nuclear weapons stockpile safe and reliable. Instead, it is for future speculative, new-design nuclear weapons called Interoperable Warheads that the Navy doesn’t even want.

Moreover, future pit production could undermine confidence in nuclear weapons reliability, since exact replicas of existing pits are NOT going to be produced.

NNSA needs to go back to the drawing board to get its plutonium ducks in a row under NEPA. Following its May 11 decision, NNSA should begin a nationwide review of plutonium pit production, why it’s needed and what it will cost the American taxpayer in financial, safety and environmental risks. These are all things that the public should know.

Coghlan is executive director of Nuclear Watch of New Mexico (www.nukewatch.org), a Santa Fe-based group that tracks Los Alamos National Laboratory and related issues in the Southwest.

 

Home » Journal North » Journal North Opinion » Assessment of LANL Rad Lab premature, incomplete

Insert Question Legislature form in Legis only stories




Albuquerque Journal and its reporters are committed to telling the stories of our community.

• Do you have a question you want someone to try to answer for you? Do you have a bright spot you want to share?
   We want to hear from you. Please email yourstory@abqjournal.com

taboola desktop

ABQjournal can get you answers in all pages

 

Questions about the Legislature?
Albuquerque Journal can get you answers
Email addresses are used solely for verification and to speed the verification process for repeat questioners.
1
Valentine's Day in Albuquerque: Lovers, friends and lonely hearts ...
ABQnews Seeker
There are plenty of fun options ... There are plenty of fun options for everyone to celebrate on or around the occasion
2
Ready for Rihanna? A look at five songs that ...
ABQnews Seeker
Journal Staff WriterI am not sure ... Journal Staff WriterI am not sure if you have heard, but there is a football game this ...
3
Prep notes: After five-overtime win, Del Norte basketball boys ...
Featured Sports
Del Norte and Bernalillo on Tuesday ... Del Norte and Bernalillo on Tuesday night played the longest boys high school basketball game in New Mexico this century. The Knights and the ...
4
Lobo women have a chance to make up some ...
College
Which of you has the best ... Which of you has the best finishing kick? It's a pertinent question for seven Mountain West women's basketball teams who are tightly bunched in ...
5
Forest Service conducts prescribed burns in New Mexico
ABQnews Seeker
"We're doing everything we can to ... "We're doing everything we can to be prepared and prevent an unintended outcome," said Cibola National Forest Fire Fuels and Aviation Staff Officer Matt ...
6
7 activities around the state to love this Valentine's ...
ABQnews Seeker
This weekend leads into Valentine's Day, ... This weekend leads into Valentine's Day, a holiday commonly associated with amor. Here are some activities to help you spend time with those you ...
7
Magician Jordan Jonas brings card tricks, mind reading and ...
ABQnews Seeker
Albuquerque magician Jordan Jonas brings his ... Albuquerque magician Jordan Jonas brings his creepy brand of psychic ability, sideshow stunts and storytelling into a haunted evening at Fusion at 7 p.m. ...
8
7 gun laws proposed in New Mexico
ABQnews Seeker
Gun control legislation is a priority ... Gun control legislation is a priority this year; here’s a round-up of what proposed laws would do, and where they’re at in the process.
9
New Mexico basketball: Five Alford and Nevada takeaways from ...
College
New Mexico fell to Nevada in ... New Mexico fell to Nevada in a 77-76 men's basketball heartbreaker on Tuesday night, thanks to last-second heroics from Kenan Blackshear.  With the win, ...