Editorial: Critics should cool their jets on Holtec canisters

As the Nuclear Regulatory Commission considers Holtec International’s proposal to build an interim storage facility for spent utility fuel in southeast New Mexico, there’s a lot of fear surrounding the “n” word. As in nuclear.

And as in, “what if a terrorist targets the storage site? What if the train derails on the way? What if the canisters holding the nuclear fuel crack?”

We get it. Radiation is dangerous and residents and others are right to expect their government to be diligent and thorough when considering permitting this $2.4 billion project between Hobbs and Carlsbad. New Mexicans sickened by uranium mining and nuclear weapons testing during the Cold War just got a Congressional hearing, for heaven’s sake.

But southeast New Mexico is powered by nuclear expertise, with the WIPP storage facility, the $4 billion Urenco USA uranium enrichment plant, as well as a planned spent-fuel storage facility by Waste Control Specialists and French firm AREVA Inc. across the Texas line. Five public meetings on Holtec have given no reason to think it won’t be a positive addition to “nuclear alley.”

Look no further than the Sierra Club in San Onofre, home to a decommissioned power plant and a storage site similar to New Mexico’s – albeit next to the Pacific Ocean – to see these interim sites are a much safer option than what’s going on now, and likely the best option available. The environmental group is echoing Holtec’s position on sites, transit and canisters.

To be clear, what’s going on now is this: More than 70,000 metric tons of used reactor fuel from power plants are stored in 73 different sites across 39 states, some next to rivers or atop water tables. Taxpayers pay to guard these sites, energy companies have gotten more than $5 billion in settlements because the feds have yet to open Yucca Mountain as a permanent repository, and D.C. spends $500 million to $600 million annually defending itself against such lawsuits.

Holtec would put that waste in interim storage sites that are at grade; in New Mexico that’s at a 960-acre remote site between Carlsbad and Hobbs that is geologically stable with no potable aquifers. It will have a 672-acre security and safety buffer zone. And Holtec says over 25,000 shipments of 87,000 metric tons of used nuclear fuel have been made worldwide with no injury.

But don’t just take it from the industry, take it from the environmentalists. Marni Magda, chair of the Angeles Chapter Sierra Club San Onofre Task Force, recently wrote in The Laguna Beach Independent about the discussion from 19 meetings over three years regarding oversight:

• The system is flush to the ground, less of a terrorist target.

• The stainless steel 5/8″-canisters (thin, and to be used in New Mexico) are superior to the heavy, stand-alone carbon steel cask system (thick, and in which a loose pin was discovered in San Onofre in February) because the canisters can be moved more easily and are therefore safer in transport out of the (utility site) cooling pools and in and out of the containers.

• The Angeles Chapter agrees with (San Onofre plant majority owner) Edison that the Holtec system is the best the industry can provide.

That rationale is not from an industry insider, but an environmentalist living with the risk of the nation’s current storage scheme who prefers living with a Holtec interim facility.

As Magda writes, “sadly, nothing will last the 10,000 years the fuel must be contained. We have a great deal of work ahead of us.” So rather than pulling another “what if” out of a hat, critics should focus on getting answers to the real questions for New Mexico from the federal government regarding Holtec: “Define ‘interim’ and where is the ‘permanent’ site?”

This editorial first appeared in the Albuquerque Journal. It was written by members of the editorial board and is unsigned as it represents the opinion of the newspaper rather than the writers.

Share Your Story

Nativo Sponsored Content

Ad Tango


taboola desktop

MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS

1
Editorial: Burrito saga poor way to unwrap hard job ...
Editorials
Question: When can an Albuquerque police ... Question: When can an Albuquerque police officer eat a burrito while driving a police cruiser? ...
2
Editorial: Spend feds' windfall on students, not status quo
Editorials
With 5,000 fewer students, Albuquerque Public ... With 5,000 fewer students, Albuquerque Public Schools in typical times would stand to lose over $50 ...
3
Editorial: House Democrats' crime package deserves a serious look ...
Editorials
With the homicide statistics in Albuquerque ... With the homicide statistics in Albuquerque reaching critical mass, the Democratic leadership in sta ...
4
Editorial: Proposed stadium PAC's fact vs. fiction deserves a ...
Editorials
It's at least worth a yellow ... It's at least worth a yellow card.The pro-stadium political action committee funded by ...
5
Editorial: '19 NM law may get more students hooked ...
Editorials
Many Journal letter writers — including ... Many Journal letter writers — including current and former educators — insist it's ...
6
Editorial: DOJ reform process ready for a do-over
Editorials
"The pendulum has swung too far ... "The pendulum has swung too far ... where officers do not feel supported, or that they can do their ...
7
Local animal shelters face their own housing crisis
Editorials
Despite all that's going on, the ... Despite all that's going on, the treatment of animals is a measure of how, well, humane a society is.
8
Editorial: State-run prisons are a smart but costly course ...
Editorials
Staffing prisons is often tough. So ... Staffing prisons is often tough. So it was hoped during the administration of former Gov. Gary Johns ...
9
Editorial: ABQ speed vans can't have a profit motive
Editorials
City leaders agree Albuquerque has a ... City leaders agree Albuquerque has a problem with dangerous speeding and racing. Officers conducting ...