3 bills finally give NM a current water plan - Albuquerque Journal

3 bills finally give NM a current water plan

Imagine that you are a passenger in a car being driven down the interstate highway at 80 mph. A quarter mile ahead you see that the road has been washed out by a flash flood. The driver has seen the washout for at least a minute but shows no signs of putting his foot on the brake or taking the off-ramp.

This is a good analogy for the water situation in New Mexico. We have known for a couple of decades that a series of crises are impending, but almost nothing has changed in the way the state administers water. We know, for example, that since the mid-1970s the average temperature in New Mexico has increased by about 3 degrees Fahrenheit and by the end of this century it is predicted to increase by an additional 5 to 6 degrees. Heat dries out the landscape, and thus it should be no surprise that flow in the Rio Grande has reached the average value for the 20th Century only three times in the 18 years since 2000. The Bureau of Reclamation has projected that by the end of this century, the average flow of the Rio Grande will be only half of what it was in the 20th Century.

What plan does the State have to deal with the fallout? The answer is no plan.

On top of this inexorable decline in the availability of water, the Rio Grande also faces the Texas lawsuit in the Supreme Court over the Rio Grande Compact. If the verdict is negative, the state will have to send more of the shrinking supply south over the Texas border.

What preparations have been made to deal with this contingency, or to ensure New Mexico’s continued deliveries to Elephant Butte of the required annual amounts? None.

In the southeastern part of the state, the famous Ogallala aquifer has either already been sucked dry or will be within 10 years. There will be no groundwater to supply either the city of Clovis or future industry that might replace the vanished farms. This outcome is due to the state lacking any sustainability criterion for groundwater management, but no changes have been made in state law to address the lack.

The New Mexico water code was originally passed by the Territorial Legislature in 1907. The principal concern was to promote rapid development and distribution of irrigation water from federal projects. The current concerns are vastly different, but we’re still using the 1907 water law. It’s a little like trying to protect intellectual property on the internet using 19th Century laws copyrighting sheet music.

This year, finally, three bills have been introduced in the Legislature to try to bring some parts of New Mexico water administration into the 21st Century. House Bill 174 proposes establishing a modern set of rules for ensuring Rio Grande Compact compliance in the Middle Rio Grande and addressing shortages. HB 186 directs the N.M. Interstate Stream Commission to complete serious water planning based on facts, science and climate-change projections. HB 187 enables the Utton Transboundary Center at UNM to assess the current water laws and propose changes to deal with the changed circumstances.

These bills were not written by any vested interests but rather are the result of a grassroots citizen effort. Copies of the bills and explanations are available from WaterAssembly.org.

Like any efforts proposing water-policy change, these bills are bound to be controversial. They will certainly evolve as they go through the legislative process. But they deserve the public’s support because they are the first serious attempt in many decades to deal with New Mexico’s impending water crises. Like any smart driver, New Mexico needs to look forward and steer around the dangers. These bills are a great alternative to continuing to race blindly over the edge.

Home » Opinion » Guest Columns » 3 bills finally give NM a current water plan

Insert Question Legislature form in Legis only stories

Albuquerque Journal and its reporters are committed to telling the stories of our community.

• Do you have a question you want someone to try to answer for you? Do you have a bright spot you want to share?
   We want to hear from you. Please email yourstory@abqjournal.com

taboola desktop

ABQjournal can get you answers in all pages


Questions about the Legislature?
Albuquerque Journal can get you answers
Email addresses are used solely for verification and to speed the verification process for repeat questioners.
Editorial: BernCo taxpayers stuck with $7M error
OPINION: BernCo's misuse of federal funds ... OPINION: BernCo's misuse of federal funds is going to unnecessarily cost taxpayers $7.1 million.
Editorial: APS must get a handle on guns ...
From the Editorial Board: Growing problem ... From the Editorial Board: Growing problem of guns on campuses erodes confidence that APS schools are safe.
Four deaths in 24 hours: Details emerge in weekend ...
ABQnews Seeker
Police identify 3 of 4 homicide ... Police identify 3 of 4 homicide victims.
Contact employers directly to share why you are switching ...
ABQnews Seeker
ADVICE: Don't be the rookie; be ... ADVICE: Don't be the rookie; be the easy hire.
These adorable Chihuahuas survived a deadly crash in January ...
ABQnews Seeker
All but two tiny pooches found ... All but two tiny pooches found their furever homes at an adoption event at Woof Gang Bakery and Grooming
WNIT loss ends New Mexico women's basketball season
ABQnews Seeker
After rallying from an 11-point deficit ... After rallying from an 11-point deficit and building a 10-point lead, the Lobos ran out of steam in the final 10 minutes of a ...
Albuquerque water guide: Irrigate efficiently for the landscape you ...
ABQnews Seeker
Guide for area gardeners gives practical ... Guide for area gardeners gives practical tips to save water in high desert
A flashing yellow turn arrow means what?
ABQnews Seeker
Are flashing yellow arrows coming to ... Are flashing yellow arrows coming to more intersections?
Two utility cases, two different outcomes
ABQnews Seeker
Why did New Mexico’s Public Regulation ... Why did New Mexico’s Public Regulation Commission approve an El Paso Electric buyout, then scrutinize and reject PNM’s merger a year later?