No line to walk on ABQ panhandling law - Albuquerque Journal

No line to walk on ABQ panhandling law

In its recent editorial (July 29), the Albuquerque Journal suggests that in the wake of federal judge Robert C. Brack’s ruling that the Albuquerque “Pedestrian Safety Ordinance” violates the First Amendment, the city of Albuquerque can still somehow “walk the line” on safety and free speech.

But let’s get real. Albuquerque’s “public safety” ordinance was always an anti-panhandling law dressed up in public safety clothes, not a serious attempt to improve pedestrian safety within our city. The public safety fig leaf looked extra skimpy from the start, given that the city tried to pass an ordinance in 2004 that explicitly banned panhandling in certain parts of Albuquerque. This law, too, was struck down by the court as unconstitutional.

That’s the real problem here. The city can’t “walk the line” because the intent was always to drive the most vulnerable and desperate in our community out of public spaces where they are most visible. Any ordinance that has the primary intent and effect of suppressing the visibility of people in poverty is almost guaranteed to run afoul of the First Amendment.

Simply put: Poor people have the right to exist in public spaces. And if that makes us uncomfortable, if it makes us angry to see, then good. It should cause us discomfort; it should make us angry that we, the richest and most powerful nation that has ever existed, have insufficient political will to address the structural causes and underlying drivers of poverty.

And let’s be clear: Criminalizing poverty only makes the problem worse. Handing out fines to people who can’t afford to pay them is just a recipe for plunging people deeper into poverty and desperation. Arresting people for asking for help only endlessly cycles people in and out of the criminal justice system at taxpayer expense. We can’t punish our way out of this problem, and we can’t sweep it under the rug.

This most recent ruling should convince the city that there is no legal path forward for these kinds of panhandling laws, as the Journal suggests there might be if only the city would do a better job “mining its horrifying pedestrian death statistics” to provide evidence that the next incarnation of the law is actually oriented toward improving public safety. If they could have, they would have done so already. Attorneys for the city had ample opportunity to provide convincing evidence to the court that people standing on medians or near street corners is a serious threat to public safety, but they had nothing to offer but speculation.

Indeed, out of hundreds of pages of evidence presented in the case, the city could point to only four pedestrian/vehicle conflicts in the past four years that clearly involved someone standing on a median or ramp, who was not otherwise likely violating an existing law. Furthermore, a 2016 study conducted by the University of New Mexico on improving pedestrian safety in Albuquerque makes no mention of panhandling as a significant concern, instead listing recommendations as public education campaigns, safer crosswalks, and better lighting as the most important things the city can do to make pedestrians safer. Quite simply, there is no link to people panhandling in medians and Albuquerque’s high rate of vehicles hitting pedestrians.

Albuquerque should abandon its pursuit of anti-panhandling ordinances, like many other municipalities around the state have recently done, and focus its efforts on real traffic safety solutions for the people of our city. After experiencing a close call recently on a crosswalk Downtown, I, for one, would greatly appreciate it.

Home » Opinion » Guest Columns » No line to walk on ABQ panhandling law

Albuquerque Journal and its reporters are committed to telling the stories of our community.

• Do you have a question you want someone to try to answer for you? Do you have a bright spot you want to share?
   We want to hear from you. Please email

taboola desktop

APS' continuing issues with HVAC cause health concerns
ABQnews Seeker
District says it has 385 open ... District says it has 385 open work orders related to air-conditioning
NM reporter's rally ejection ignites controversy over press access
ABQnews Seeker
Ronchetti campaign claims journalist's publication is ... Ronchetti campaign claims journalist's publication is a left-wing advocacy company
Nonprofit helping vets expands to a new location
ABQnews Seeker
Heroes Walk Among Us aims to ... Heroes Walk Among Us aims to get veterans back on their feet
The inaugural New Mexico Asian Film Festival strives to ...
The inaugural festival will take place ... The inaugural festival will take place from 6-9 p.m. Friday, Aug. 19, at Balloon Fiesta Park. The film festival is part of the two-day ...
Bawarchi Biryanis delivers a solid rendition of its namesake ...
Dining Reviews
Prices at Bawarchi – ... Prices at Bawarchi – the word roughly translates into 'chef' – are comparable to those the Heights' two well-established Indian ...
Gravity Bound Brewing Co. wins its first NM Brewers ...
Gravity Bound Brewing Co. took home ... Gravity Bound Brewing Co. took home the trophy with a hazy IPA. It is the first win for the brewery and it is the ...
Vegan festival to feature vendors, cooking demos and more
Red & Green VegFest will takes ... Red & Green VegFest will takes place on Saturday, Aug. 20, at the Jewish Community Center of Greater Albuquerque.
Hooveriii to make tour stop at Sister on Friday, ...
Hooveriii (pronounced Hover Three) released 'A ... Hooveriii (pronounced Hover Three) released 'A Round of Applause' in July.
NEEDTOBREATHE opening for OneRepublic at Isleta
NEEDTOBREATHE will make a stop on ... NEEDTOBREATHE will make a stop on OneRepublic's 'Never Ending Summer Tour' at 7 p.m. Tuesday, Aug. 23, at Isleta Amphitheater.