By MICHAEL DALY
“Legalize today for a brighter tomorrow” is the title of five full pages of advertising by Ultra Health which labels itself New Mexico’s No. 1 Cannabis Company in the Dec. 28 Business Outlook. …
The prohibition of alcohol in the 1930s and our more recent and much longer experience with the so-called “war on drugs” demonstrates it in spades. We need to legalize to control the use and spread and take away the incentive for illegal marketing just as we have rather successfully done with alcohol.
The cannabis we are talking about here is a powerful drug. While stoned, users experience an emotionally stimulating environment during which otherwise dull sights, sounds, tastes and thoughts become intensely rich.
These effects are very tempting.
Unfortunately, there are other effects that are not so desired.
It clouds thinking. In youths it impairs brain development. Regular use creates a fog in the brain and impairs one’s ability to take in information.
Other effects include disrupting motor skills and, like alcohol, reducing one’s inhibitions.
Our society has a big problem with drug and alcohol addiction and those problems are closely related to crime.
In McKinley County, of the hundreds charged with misdemeanor offenses one former county staff worker estimated that about 70% of the cases involved drugs and alcohol. And most are repeat offenders.
Meanwhile our treatment center can handle about 30 people at a time and there is very little follow-up care.
Using marijuana taxes to cover the cost of regulating it and any balance used to care for those in treatment would pay larger dividends than any short-term gain from placing them into the general fund, which, of course, is what many of the legislators want to do and why Ultra Health is marketing this idea in their ads.
Norway and Sweden revised their criminal justice system to emphasize making the criminals good citizens capable of taking care of themselves and their recidivism rate went from over 70% to 20%.
We could do the same thing.
As for drug legalization, Portugal did this in an intelligent manner and their addicted population dropped from 100,000 to 30,000.
When we think of all the crime and violence associated with the drug trade and the cost of our “war” and incarceration of addicts, doesn’t it make sense to take a broader look beyond tax advantages?