NM sues US over nuclear waste storage plans - Albuquerque Journal

NM sues US over nuclear waste storage plans

A rendering of the first phase of Holtec International’s proposed consolidated interim storage facility for spent nuclear fuel in southeast New Mexico. The state sued the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission on Monday over concerns that the federal agency hasn’t done enough to vet plans for a multibillion-dollar facility to store spent nuclear fuel in the state. (Courtesy of Holtec International)

New Mexico sued the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission on Monday over concerns the federal agency hasn’t done enough to vet plans for a multibillion-dollar facility to store spent nuclear fuel in the state, arguing the project would endanger residents, the environment and the economy.

New Jersey-based Holtec International wants to build a complex in southeastern New Mexico where tons of spent fuel from commercial nuclear power plants around the nation could be stored until the federal government finds a permanent solution. State officials worry New Mexico will become a permanent dumping ground for the radioactive material.

The complaint filed in federal court contends the commission overstepped its authority regarding Holtec’s plans and that granting a license to the company could result in “imminent and substantial endangerment” to New Mexico. The state cited the potential for surface and groundwater contamination, disruption of oil and gas development in one of the nation’s most productive basins and added strain on emergency response resources.

The state also raised concerns about a similar project planned just across the state line in West Texas.

New Mexico has accused the commission of colluding with Holtec in “rubber-stamping” the proposal. The state argues that almost every interested party that has filed a challenge has been denied standing and an opportunity to meaningfully participate.

“The NRC’s mandate does not include policy setting or altering the public debate and emphatically cheerleading nuclear industry projects. Yet it is doing both to the detriment of New Mexico,” the complaint says.

The commission did not immediately respond to questions about New Mexico’s complaint. However, it has maintained over the course of the licensing process that it has followed procedure and that public hearings have been held and an environmental review was done.

Some elected leaders in southeastern New Mexico support the project, saying it would bring jobs and revenue to the region and provide a temporary option for dealing with the spent fuel.

Holtec is seeking a 40-year license to build what it has described as a state-of-the-art complex near Carlsbad, which already is home to the federal government’s only underground repository for Cold War-era waste generated by decades of nuclear research and bomb-making.

Holtec executives have said the storage project is needed because the U.S. has yet to find a permanent solution for dealing with the tons of spent fuel building up at commercial nuclear power plants.

According to the U.S. Energy Department, nuclear reactors across the country produce more than 2,000 metric tons of radioactive waste a year, with most of it remaining on-site because there’s nowhere else to put it. In all, there’s roughly 83,000 metric tons of spent fuel sitting at temporary storage sites in nearly three dozen states. The fuel is either enclosed in steel-lined concrete pools of water or in steel and concrete containers known as casks.

The first phase of the proposed New Mexico project calls for storing up to 8,680 metric tons of uranium, which would be packed into 500 canisters. Future expansion could make room for as many as 10,000 canisters of spent nuclear fuel over six decades.

Holtec has said the site in New Mexico – about 35 miles from Carlsbad – is remote and geologically stable.

The state first objected to federal regulators’ preliminary recommendation that a license be granted to Holtec in comments submitted to the commission last fall. Aside from New Mexico’s other concerns, state officials have said regulators failed to consider environmental justice concerns and have fallen short of other requirements spelled out by federal environmental laws.


Albuquerque Journal and its reporters are committed to telling the stories of our community.

• Do you have a question you want someone to try to answer for you? Do you have a bright spot you want to share?
   We want to hear from you. Please email yourstory@abqjournal.com

Nativo Sponsored Content

taboola desktop

MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS

1
Ex-TorC judge, her husband sentenced to prison
ABQnews Seeker
Couple stole $284,000 from the estate ... Couple stole $284,000 from the estate of a dead man
2
SNM gang member sentenced to life in prison
ABQnews Seeker
Among the crimes attributed to the ... Among the crimes attributed to the 42-year-old is the 2008 murder of his cousin
3
DA’s lawsuit seeks GPS data for defendants on pretrial ...
ABQnews Seeker
District Attorney Raúl Torrez on Thursday ... District Attorney Raúl Torrez on Thursday sued the administrator of the 2nd Judicial District Court in Albuquerque, alleging that court officials are violating the ...
4
Rio Arriba sheriff resigns as 3-year sentence is imposed
ABQnews Seeker
Judge: Officials 'must be held to ... Judge: Officials 'must be held to higher standard'
5
Suspect charged in attempt to rob West Side bank
ABQnews Seeker
Man tells police he 'just wanted ... Man tells police he 'just wanted to send a message'
6
Isleta officer charged in rape of suspect
ABQnews Seeker
Woman had been arrested for DWI Woman had been arrested for DWI
7
Rio Arriba Sheriff Lujan guilty of 2 felonies
ABQnews Seeker
James Lujan remained free pending a ... James Lujan remained free pending a sentencing hearing Thursday
8
Trial starts for suspect in uncle's shooting death
ABQnews Seeker
Prosecutor disputes claim of self-defense as ... Prosecutor disputes claim of self-defense as 2020 security video reviewed
9
Canon, Balloon Fiesta settle sponsorship lawsuit
ABQnews Seeker
Canon had demanded $250,000 reimbursement, alleging ... Canon had demanded $250,000 reimbursement, alleging violation of an agreement