Delivery alert

There may be an issue with the delivery of your newspaper. This alert will expire at NaN. Click here for more info.

Recover password

Rio Rancho council should reject zoning change

We moved to Rio Rancho six years ago. We both held builder licenses in New Mexico.

We did the responsible thing before choosing our ½-acre lot at Fourth Avenue SW and Rainbow Boulevard. We checked the area plot map.

All the surrounding area lots were also ½-acre. No commercial multi-plexes, no apartments and no small lots. All ½-acre lots, including but not limited to Third Avenue SW.

Then in March 2019, the notice came. The applicant began the request to change the zoning map. The request was for only one street, but all of Third Avenue SW. At that time and currently, it consisted of approximately 64 ½-acre lots.

The change was to make 188 lots. What?

We spoke against the change. This issue is not a NIMBY issue.

Rainbow Boulevard is a horrible mess. Eight-inch cracks and patched asphalt. When vehicles, such as garbage trucks, pass by our house, they currently and have always vibrated our windows, floors and even our china cabinets.

When deciding this issue in 2019, the reason for changing the zoning was the applicant had been working on this for 20 years, so let’s let him change the zoning. The councilors approved this subdivision based on 20 years, not the impact to the surrounding residents.

The planning and zoning staff, after much research, gave a recommendation of no to this project on April 19, 2019, citing so many concerns. Water, sewer, traffic, roads, the lots were too small, and the applicant did not demonstrate consistency with the health, safety, morals and general welfare of the city.

The staff found no criteria had been met for the approval of the zoning change. Then Rio Rancho city councilors, against their own staff’s recommendation, approved the zoning change. We sat in the audience stunned.

Something in Rio Rancho was not right in 2019. This project could have gone four streets north, where smaller lots would have been accepted. The applicant should have looked at the plot map.

This project went against the comprehensive plan and the city’s own master plans and amendments, as noted by the staff’s denial. The councilors and mayor knew this was wrong.

Now comes a new hearing at 6 p.m. Tuesday, April 13. The general public is not allowed to attend due to COVID-19.

One hundred eighty-eight lots on one street with residential half-acre lots now. Must a class-action lawsuit be filed to address this issue?

This project is wrong.

We know the mayor is pushing for lots of subdivisions in Rio Rancho. This does not make his decisions right.

After COVID, Rio Rancho will need to really look at impacting the city with subdivisions.

Councilors of Rio Rancho, please hear the taxpayers, voters and majority of residents, and reconsider voting for this subdivision. The ramifications are lasting and permanent. Vote no — it’s the right thing to do.




Albuquerque Journal and its reporters are committed to telling the stories of our community.

• Do you have a story about how coronavirus has affected you, your family or your business? Do you have a question you want someone to try to answer for you? What issues related to the topic would you like to see covered? Or do you have a bright spot you want to share in these troubling times?
   We want to hear from you. Please email yourstory@abqjournal.com or Contact the writer.


TOP |