Nuclear injustice in NM must end - Albuquerque Journal

Nuclear injustice in NM must end

By DENNIS MCQUILLAN

New Mexico residents have long endured disproportionately high health and environmental risks from nuclear energy and weapons programs. It is time for the federal government to protect citizens of the state with the greatest possible level of safeguards.

Instead of performing critical site-suitability analyses for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) and for two proposed spent nuclear fuel (SNF) “storage” sites near WIPP, federal agencies attempted to validate their predetermined conclusions that these sites were safe. The agencies either disregarded or rewrote siting criteria to accommodate their decisions to approve these sites.

WIPP is intended to provide deep geologic isolation of nuclear waste from the biosphere and, indeed, waste is buried 2,150 feet underground in 250-million-year-old salt beds. The following WIPP safety deficiencies, however, need resolution:

• The half-life of plutonium-239 is 24,100 years, but the WIPP safety assessment period is limited to 10,000 years.

• For years, the federal government asserted that petroleum resources were minimal to nonexistent below WIPP. But, today, WIPP is surrounded by oil and gas operations in the most prolific oil patch in the United States. The risk that oil drilling may penetrate the repository, or that liquids injected during fracking, advanced recovery and produced water disposal may migrate into WIPP salt beds, must be reevaluated.

• Risks from an artesian brine aquifer, deep-seated salt dissolution and from highly pressurized brine pockets that underlie the WIPP salt beds are not fully assessed.

• The geochemical mobility of plutonium and uranium, and possible interactions with carbon dioxide generated by waste decomposition and with geologic brine, needs further analysis.

• Additional prevention is needed for such human errors as the 2014 accident where plutonium contaminated nitrate salt packed with organic kitty litter generated heat, burst a waste drum, contaminated 21 workers, and released americium and plutonium into the atmosphere.

WIPP is certified to accept only national defense waste. The federal government, after spending decades and millions of dollars, failed to establish a permanent disposal site for spent nuclear fuel from commercial reactors. SNF is highly radioactive and toxic due to fission byproducts created during power generation.

The federal government now proposes to license two commercial facilities near WIPP, one in New Mexico and one in Texas, for the “storage” of SNF for up to 120 years. Unlike the deep geologic isolation at WIPP, the proposed SNF storage facilities are less than 100 feet deep, in young alluvium, and in a region with shallow groundwater, as well as concerns about ground subsidence and sinkholes. These two sites are geologically unsuitable even for SNF “storage” and it is possible that decades of “storage” could morph into permanent disposal. Excavating SNF that has deteriorated underground for 120 years is a lurid scenario. Or will future engineers build a Chernobyl-style sarcophagus with the hope that it isolates the waste for 24,000 years?

The proposed “storage” sites for SNF could create dangers far greater than those posed by WIPP. Agricultural and petroleum industry organizations expressed concerns that the SNF facilities could damage their livelihoods. Attorney General Balderas sued the federal government to stop these ill-conceived and dangerous proposals to store SNF.

The legacy of nuclear injustice in New Mexico must end. The federal government must:

• Resolve WIPP safety deficiencies

• Disallow the reckless “storage” of spent nuclear fuel

• Establish one or more permanent repositories for SNF that provide geologic isolation

Geologist Dennis McQuillan lives in Santa Fe.

 


Albuquerque Journal and its reporters are committed to telling the stories of our community.

• Do you have a question you want someone to try to answer for you? Do you have a bright spot you want to share?
   We want to hear from you. Please email yourstory@abqjournal.com

Nativo Sponsored Content

Ad Tango


taboola desktop

MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS

1
Which type of vehicle should I buy next?
Energy
National survey finds 55.9% of car ... National survey finds 55.9% of car owners 'likely' to buy an electric or hybrid vehicle
2
NM native poised to step into CEO job at ...
ABQnews Seeker
From Silver City paperboy to one ... From Silver City paperboy to one of state's highest-profile positions
3
Some details could jump start LANL's case for power ...
Editorials
It will take more effort and ... It will take more effort and information before a persuasive case can be made
4
Gov. pitches hydrogen energy to oil, natural gas executives
ABQnews Seeker
With protesters outside, Lujan Grisham promotes ... With protesters outside, Lujan Grisham promotes 'transitional fuel of future'
5
NM moves to fast track hydrogen hub
Business
New Mexico is barreling forward with ... New Mexico is barreling forward with industry and government plans to turn the state into one of the ...
6
NM natural gas prices expected to surge
ABQnews Seeker
New Mexico Gas Co. is forecasting ... New Mexico Gas Co. is forecasting a 179% increase this October compared with last year
7
Natural gas prices skyrocket
Energy
Approach of winter and a robust ... Approach of winter and a robust economic recovery causing surge
8
Feds say tougher rules needed to protect Texas power ...
Energy
Federal officials made more than two ... Federal officials made more than two dozen recommendations Thursday aimed at further safeguarding power plants and natural gas supplies to prevent a repeat of ...
9
Hearing begins for next round of NM oil, gas ...
Around the Region
Focus turns to ozone-producing pollution Focus turns to ozone-producing pollution