Gonzales shifts course, turns to private donors

Sheriff Manuel Gonzales, accompanied Tuesday by supporters of his mayoral bid, announced he will end his fight for public campaign financing and work to fund his run with private donations. (Adolphe Pierre-Louis/Albuquerque Journal)

Copyright © 2021 Albuquerque Journal

Just hours after losing another round in his prolonged and fruitless legal fight for public campaign financing, Bernalillo County Sheriff Manuel Gonzales said he will try a new tack in the 2021 mayor’s race.

Gonzales said Tuesday afternoon he would turn to private donors for support, forgoing his quest to get taxpayer money for his campaign.

The decision comes just seven weeks before Election Day and concludes his monthslong battle over the publicly funded campaign pot worth about $600,000. Gonzales’ battle sustained a blow earlier Tuesday when a state judge ruled that City Clerk Ethan Watson had taken the appropriate actions necessary to deny Gonzales the taxpayer money and rejected Gonzales’ claims that Watson was biased.

The sheriff told a news confere

nce Tuesday that he was disappointed in the judge’s ruling but that his supporters will not be “hushed” and are ready to power him through private donations and in the voting booth.

“This is something that has never happened to another campaign. And I think that’s going to be the driving force, and the motivation, and the inspiration for us winning this race,” he said at his Northeast Albuquerque campaign office as about 15 supporters stood behind him.

As a privately funded candidate, Gonzales will be able to solicit contributions of up to $6,250 per donor.

Gonzales has a lot of ground to make up on incumbent Tim Keller, who did receive the public financing and had $524,710 in his campaign coffers as of last week, according to campaign finance reports. Gonzales has $20,830. Candidate Eddy Aragon – who launched a late mayoral bid and is privately funded – has $13,360 in hand, his latest report shows.

Private donors for months have been supporting Gonzales’ mayoral candidacy through Save Our City, a political action committee backing the sheriff. But the latest campaign finance report shows that donations recently have waned. Save Our City raised $12,672 in the past month after bringing in $75,855 in July and $52,500 during the June reporting period.

Asked by the Journal on Tuesday whether that was cause for alarm, the sheriff said he does not pay attention to the PAC’s efforts and is not worried. He said donors could have been sitting back until they could give directly to the sheriff’s campaign, which his Tuesday decision allows.

“Maybe they were waiting for today,” Gonzales said.

Gonzales’ shift in strategy comes after a contentious and high-profile clash with City Clerk Watson over whether Watson had improperly denied Gonzales about $600,000 to run his mayoral campaign.

To qualify for the funding, mayoral candidates must demonstrate sufficient community interest in their bids by getting 1% of city voters – 3,779 people – to make a nominal donation of $5.

Keller and Gonzales both appeared to reach that mark, according to numbers posted on the city clerk’s website in June.

However, Watson on July 9 declined to certify Gonzales for the money, citing evidence he had received as part of two ethics complaints Keller’s reelection campaign had filed against the sheriff. Both complaints involved alleged fraud in the collection of the $5 qualifying contributions.

In the first ethics complaint, a voter said that he signed a $5 receipt to support the sheriff but that Gonzales told him he did not need to pay the money because the campaign would cover it. Candidates can only submit money received from the named contributor. The city’s Board of Ethics & Campaign Practices – after a three-hour hearing – decided that Gonzales violated the city’s Open and Ethical Elections Code in the case.

In the second complaint, Keller’s campaign challenged the authenticity of signatures on paperwork Gonzales turned in to the city clerk and subsequently provided statements from about 40 voters who said they never signed the $5 receipts Gonzales submitted in their names.

Many of the questioned receipts were tied to two women with key roles in the Gonzales campaign – women Gonzales had designated as official representatives with authority to interact with the Clerk’s Office on his campaign’s behalf.

The city’s Office of Inspector General – an independent city accountability agency – has since investigated the matter, finding last month that there were problems with nearly 16% of the 239 randomly selected Gonzales campaign receipts it reviewed. The voters identified in those instances said either that they signed the receipt but never gave money or that they never signed the receipt or gave $5.

Gonzales’ attorneys have acknowledged forgery likely did occur but deny that the sheriff himself knew about it. They also have contended that Gonzales still had enough contributions to qualify for the public money even after disregarding the questionable receipts. And they have argued that Watson – who was appointed by Keller and whose term as clerk is tied to Keller’s – is not impartial and that he made his July decision without giving Gonzales the opportunity to answer the claims.

The sheriff has had little success fighting Watson’s determination.

Gonzales first appealed it in July, prompting an administrative hearing. The hearing officer upheld Watson’s decision.

The sheriff subsequently appealed in New Mexico District Court. Judge Bryan Biedscheid of the 1st Judicial District ruled on Aug. 27 that Watson had not given Gonzales due process and sent the matter back down to the clerk to rectify.

In response, Watson gave Gonzales a chance to address the fraud claims during a Sept. 1 hearing – after which Watson decided, for the second time, that Gonzales should not get the money due to rules violations.

The sheriff asked Biedscheid to rehear the case, but the judge on Tuesday said Watson’s hearing was sufficient.

Gonzales also had requested that the New Mexico Supreme Court intervene in the case, but the high court denied that petition last week.

Share Your Story

Nativo Sponsored Content

taboola desktop

MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS

1
Verus Research scratches a seven-year itch — for more ...
ABQnews Seeker
With seven years of accelerated growth ... With seven years of accelerated growth under its belt, Albuquerque engineering firm Verus Research h ...
2
New Mexico reports 5 cases of West Nile virus ...
ABQnews Seeker
State health officials say they have ... State health officials say they have identified five cases of West Nile virus infections across New Mexico and that wet weather may be a ...
3
Prison gang defendant convicted of murder
ABQnews Seeker
Long-running federal racketeering case ends for ... Long-running federal racketeering case ends for Syndicato de Nuevo Mexico
4
Rio Rancho theater group finally premieres 'Our Town'
ABQnews Seeker
Pandemic interrupted debut of the new ... Pandemic interrupted debut of the new troupe
5
A makeover for APS board: No incumbents running this ...
ABQnews Seeker
Influential local commercial real estate group ... Influential local commercial real estate group backing three candidates on the Nov. 2 ballot
6
Atrisco Acequia event on Saturday offers education
ABQnews Seeker
Community can learn about urban irrigation ... Community can learn about urban irrigation canals and share ideas to improve outdoor amenities
7
New Mexico reports 13 more COVID-19 deaths
ABQnews Seeker
There were 882 new cases and ... There were 882 new cases and 388 people are hospitalized
8
Redistricting proposals show shifts in CD-1 map
ABQnews Seeker
ABQ and Santa Fe could join, ... ABQ and Santa Fe could join, as citizens group seeks input
9
New Mexico gives 'Cry Macho' a different feel
ABQnews Seeker
'Cry Macho' was one of the ... 'Cry Macho' was one of the first productions to film in New Mexico when the film industry got the green light last fall. The ...