Gerrymandering is inevitable in a democracy - Albuquerque Journal

Gerrymandering is inevitable in a democracy

With the Census Bureau finally releasing its population data to the states, they will now begin the process of redrawing political boundaries for local, state and congressional seats. Anyone who believes there is some magic way of keeping politics out of the redistricting process must still believe in the tooth fairy.

In 2019, the U.S. Supreme Court held in Rucho v. Common Cause that partisan redistricting – where elected representatives from the majority political party draw boundary lines to try to give their party an advantage – is a political question beyond the reach of the federal courts. Moreover, the court pointed out that partisan redistricting is “nothing new.”

It was known “in the colonies prior to independence and the framers were familiar with it at the time of the drafting and ratification of the Constitution,” said the court. In fact, the term “gerrymandering” comes from Massachusetts Gov. Elbridge Gerry, whose name is forever linked to partisan map drawing due to a state Senate district he drew in 1812 that looked like a salamander.

Yet, the drafters of the Constitution still gave state legislatures the authority to draw congressional boundaries, showing they expected politics to be part of redistricting. Partisanship is considered a dirty word today, but partisanship is defined by the views and opinions that individuals – and the political party they favor – have about history, culture, society, politics and public policy.

Imposing a rule that legislators cannot take those interests into account – and the interests of the voters who elected them – when drawing political boundaries would destroy a fundamental element of our democratic system. Politics will always play a role in redistricting.

And why shouldn’t it? Politics is involved in who runs for office, who voters choose to represent them, and what those candidates do once they get into office. There really is no way to keep political considerations out of redistricting. Indeed, there are strong arguments against trying to do so.

One thing we know – partisan redistricting is a very inexact science because American voters are unpredictable, no matter what political consultants may tell you. Additionally, we redistrict only every 10 years, and the makeup of districts can change very quickly because we are a highly mobile society. Thus, there are numerous examples of supposedly “safe” districts at all levels – local, state and federal – being drawn for one political party that have been won by the opposition party.

There are also numerous examples of another American phenomena that makes effective partisan line-drawing difficult – the tendency of many voters to split their tickets between candidates of different political parties, depending on whether they are voting for their local city council member, their congressional representative or the president of the United States.

Some believe we can take politics out of the redistricting process by establishing so-called “independent” redistricting commissions that take the power to draw political lines away from state legislatures. All this does is move the politics and partisanship behind closed doors. Such commissions, whose members are chosen by the political parties and other government officials, are inevitably made up of individuals with partisan interests, despite their public assertions to the contrary.

As a 2019 analysis by the Capital Research Center showed, California’s “independent” redistricting commission actually drew more partisan congressional districts than the partisan Republicans controlling the Texas state legislature did. And what’s worse, such commissions are unaccountable to the people.

Voters who are unhappy with the districts drawn by legislators, county commissioners or city council members can vote them out of office. Voters can’t do that to appointed commissioners who draw partisan districts that voters don’t like.

You can’t take politics out of redistricting, but you can implement common-sense rules that prevent misshapen districts you need a GPS to navigate. Those rules should require that districts be as compact and contiguous as possible. They should follow the lines of such natural boundaries as rivers and mountains, and political boundaries such as city and county lines. That will also lead to representatives who have an interest in representing all the diverse people of a city, for example, rather than just those who are concentrated in one part of that city.

For more than 200 years, Americans have complained about partisan gerrymandering. But that is how our system works and, despite all the complaints, we have something many other people around the world envy: a remarkably stable system of governance in which our democracy has never been compromised.

Hans von Spakovsky is a senior legal fellow and manager of the Election Law Reform Initiative at the Heritage Foundation. He is co-author of the soon-to-be-released book “Our Broken Elections: How the Left Changed the Way You Vote.”


Albuquerque Journal and its reporters are committed to telling the stories of our community.

• Do you have a question you want someone to try to answer for you? Do you have a bright spot you want to share?
   We want to hear from you. Please email yourstory@abqjournal.com

Nativo Sponsored Content

Ad Tango

taboola desktop

MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS

1
Combat sports notes: Lovato rewarded for her persistence
Boxing/MMA
After at first not succeeding, Amanda ... After at first not succeeding, Amanda Lovato didn't merely try, try again.She tried, t ...
2
Back-to-work law for retired state workers could be eased
From the newspaper
NM counties, cities are struggling to ... NM counties, cities are struggling to fill positions during pandemic
3
ABQ stadium bond question is botched
ABQnews Seeker
Ballot correctly describes gross receipts tax ... Ballot correctly describes gross receipts tax issue, then mislabels it as GO bond
4
UNM regents give up power over purchasing
ABQnews Seeker
Administration given the power to make ... Administration given the power to make decisions
5
Televised mayoral debate gets personal
ABQnews Seeker
Gonzales accuses Keller of 'serious misconduct,' ... Gonzales accuses Keller of 'serious misconduct,' mayor denies allegations
6
DA to refer Gonzales fraud case to State Police
ABQnews Seeker
Case to be forwarded after mayoral ... Case to be forwarded after mayoral election
7
Fankam, Hope find each other at the right time
Featured Sports
Probably, when Amy Fankam finished her ... Probably, when Amy Fankam finished her playing career at Notre Dame, where she was an All-American, ...
8
UNM has no answers for offense or who will ...
College
If the University of New Mexico ... If the University of New Mexico had to play against Wyoming on Tuesday, senior quarterback Te ...
9
United hosts big game, tries to protect playoff spot
Featured Sports
Like it or not, late-season drama ... Like it or not, late-season drama almost seems to suit New Mexico United.A last-minute ...