Editorial: Botched question on stadium bond worth a yellow card - Albuquerque Journal

Editorial: Botched question on stadium bond worth a yellow card

A distraught voter called the Journal last week.

He had voted at one of Albuquerque’s early voting sites and says he had checked all the boxes in favor of 12 city bond questions on the ballot. But when he double-checked his work he noticed the question about the soccer stadium initially asks voters if the city should finance a multiuse public stadium with up to $50 million of gross receipt tax revenue bonds. However, the oval boxes — where you mark your vote regarding the stadium — ask if you are in favor of issuing general obligation bonds.

The voter said he typically supports GO bonds but not necessarily GRT revenue bonds, so he switched his vote to “against” the stadium bond question.

One can only wonder how many other voters have been/will be confused by the inconsistent language. The Journal broke the botched-ballot story Oct. 20 — 15 days after in-person absentee voting began at the county clerk’s annex and clerks began mailing absentee ballots, and four days after 19 early voting convenience centers opened across the city.

The Journal Editorial Board has said the stadium proposal isn’t ready for prime time. We had no idea the ballot question itself wasn’t either.

But if you listen to local officials, it’s no big deal — just a misprint on a ballot question that only carries “advisory” status anyway.

“The question on the ballot as written does not pose a legal issue because it will advise the city regarding the voter’s perspective on whether the city should issue bonds to build a multi-use stadium,” City Attorney Esteban Aguilar Jr. told the Journal.

So, if voters fill in the oval “for general obligation bonds” it really means they’re in favor of using up to $50 million of “gross receipts tax revenue bonds” to finance the proposed stadium?

GO and GRT bonds are entirely different financing mechanisms. GO bonds are paid off with property taxes. GRT bonds are paid off with taxes assessed on the sale of goods and services. GRT bonds, unlike GO bonds, do not technically require voter approval; that’s why it’s more of an advisory question.

Mayor Tim Keller’s administration has said it would pursue a GRT bond for the stadium only if voters approve the ballot question. Would approval of a flawed question meet that test? The error might not matter to some, but it did cause the Journal caller to change his vote.

Bernalillo County Attorney Ken Martinez says it’s likely too late to correct the ballot because voting is underway. He says the error is likely because GRT bonds are very unusual whereas ballot templates for GO bond questions are common.

Whether the ballot question is advisory or obligatory, it’s fundamentally flawed — and another consequence of a rushed process. There’s no real way to know the true intent of voters on the stadium question with the inconsistent ballot language.

The whole Local Election ballot is, in fact, confusing. Lines separate most questions from the responses. Someone could have spent a few minutes making it more user-friendly, but unfortunately that didn’t happen.

It’s too late to do anything about it now, but there’s a lesson here for Mayor Keller and Bernalillo County, which is in charge of the election: When you unveil a multimillion-dollar proposal just three months before early voting, you’d better have all your ducks — and questions — in a row if you want voters to understand what they are weighing in on and to fill in the correct blanks.

This editorial first appeared in the Albuquerque Journal. It was written by members of the editorial board and is unsigned as it represents the opinion of the newspaper rather than the writers.


Albuquerque Journal and its reporters are committed to telling the stories of our community.

• Do you have a question you want someone to try to answer for you? Do you have a bright spot you want to share?
   We want to hear from you. Please email yourstory@abqjournal.com

Nativo Sponsored Content

taboola desktop

MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS

1
Editorial: NM's working families and businesses need a cure ...
Editorials
Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham's proposal to ... Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham's proposal to shave one-quarter of one percentage point off the st ...
2
NM justices deal win for democracy, blow to overreach
Editorials
Yes, Virginia, there are three branches ... Yes, Virginia, there are three branches of state government. The state Supreme Cou ...
3
Editorial: Thanksgiving remains an opportunity for all of us ...
Editorials
Thanksgiving can be viewed as the ... Thanksgiving can be viewed as the holiday of respite — a vacation from your problems, so to sp ...
4
Editorial: Former governor, diplomat travels globe and gets another ...
Editorials
JOURNAL Bill Richardson with Paul Salopek ... JOURNAL Bill Richardson with Paul Salopek in 2006 ...
5
Editorial: To catch criminals, trapping ban needs real follow-through
Editorials
Beginning in April, it will be ... Beginning in April, it will be illegal to use traps, snares and wildlife poison on public lands in N ...
6
Editorial: City, state fortunate to have Kirtland AFB's steady ...
Editorials
Little did anyone fathom at the ... Little did anyone fathom at the onset of World War II that a hastily constructed training and testin ...
7
Editorial: ABQ must deal with homeless who want, or ...
Editorials
That the city has taken another ... That the city has taken another step toward actually opening the Gateway Center homeless shelter at ...
8
Editorial: Egolf’s ticket-price tweet out of bounds, would hurt ...
Editorials
New Mexico House Speaker Brian Egolf's ... New Mexico House Speaker Brian Egolf's recent tweet concerning the discrepancy in season-ticke ...
9
Editorial: Maps recommended for state House and Senate lack ...
Editorials
The last time state lawmakers were ... The last time state lawmakers were tasked with drawing new maps for the state House and Senate, it t ...