A coverage hole in NM auto insurance - Albuquerque Journal

A coverage hole in NM auto insurance

New Mexico state law requires all motorists to carry a minimum level of liability insurance.

Then again, it also requires them to obey speed limits and stop on red, even in the first second after the light changes.

The Insurance Information Institute estimates that, nationwide, about 12.6% of motorists are uninsured. In New Mexico, the figure is 21.8%, which doesn’t even make us the worst in the nation. (Thank you, Mississippi!)

When you buy car insurance in New Mexico, you’ll get uninsured motorist coverage unless you specifically decline it.

If the high number of uninsured drivers out there isn’t reason enough for you to pay the premium, remember it can kick in after a hit-and-run collision, too. According to the AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety, about one in nine car crashes fall into that category.

Uninsured motorist insurance does exactly what the name implies, allowing a policyholder to recover if injured by a person who has no insurance, or who doesn’t stop to provide insurance information.

William Brown/tribune content agency

But in New Mexico, it’s always sold in a package with under-insured motorist coverage. What does a policyholder get in return for paying premiums for under-insured motorist coverage?

Answer: less than you might expect, and in some circumstances nothing at all.

Imagine Mary, a careful driver who owns one car. She’s purchased underinsured motorist coverage in the amount of $25,000.

As she enters an Albuquerque intersection on a green light, she’s hit by Bob, who was too drunk to notice the signal had changed. Mary’s car is totaled and an ambulance rushes her to the hospital. Thankfully after three weeks she’s recovered sufficiently to return to work.

Her total monetary damages: $60,000. Bob has liability insurance, but only in the minimum amount allowed by New Mexico’s Financial Responsibility Act, which is $25,000. His insurance company promptly pays the full $25,000 to Mary, leaving her $35,000 short.

You might think that this means Bob was “underinsured” in the amount of $35,000. But that’s not how it works in New Mexico.

In New Mexico, the critical issue isn’t the amount of damages Mary suffered, but the amount of under-insured motorist coverage she purchased. As our Supreme Court declared in 1985, “the most an insured can receive is the amount of underinsurance purchased for his [or her] benefit.”

Therefore, the $25,000 of underinsured motorist coverage that Mary purchased for herself represents the maximum benefit she’s entitled to receive. Since that sum was paid by Bob’s insurer already, Mary’s own insurance company owes her nothing at all.

That’s what she receives in exchange for faithfully paying her premiums: nothing.

The result would be different, however, if Mary owned three cars and insured each for $25,000. In that case, she could “stack” (that is, combine) her policies, which would give her coverage in the total amount of $75,000, obligating her insurance company to pay her $35,000.

If this makes no sense to you, you get it. It’s an irrational system. But it’s the system our Legislature has imposed on us, as recently confirmed by our state Supreme Court.

The recent decision, known as Crutcher vs. Liberty Mutual, answered a question posed to the court by a federal judge. Often, federal judges are required to apply state law. When state law is unclear, they can “certify” a question to the state’s highest court.

Federal District Judge Judith Herrera did so in this case, way back in January 2019. But, oddly, the Supreme Court’s opinion doesn’t quote the question it answers. Reading the opinion is like hearing only the answers at a press conference.

Although the court sat on the case for 32 months, its opinion shows signs of having been written in haste. The version I downloaded contains a conspicuous typo, suggesting reliance on spellchecker in place of a human proofreader.

The opinion uses two words with long-established technical meanings (“illusory,” a contract law term, and “exclusion,” widely used in insurance policies) in nontechnical ways. Those two words, which used to have definite and well-understood meanings in New Mexico law, are now ambiguous.

The job of an appellate court is to clarify the law. This opinion muddies it.

The opinion uses the words “never” and “always,” which lawyers generally avoid because, of course, it’s not possible to foresee every future possibility. By using those words, the opinion ranges far beyond any issue presented, for no purpose.

But for all its sloppiness, the opinion accomplishes one thing: It underscores the need for the Legislature to rewrite its old statute to ensure that New Mexicans finally start to receive value for the premiums they pay for underinsured motorist coverage.

Joel Jacobsen is an author who in 2015 retired from a 29-year legal career. If there are topics you would like to see covered in future columns, please write him at legal.column.tips@gmail.com.

 

Home » Business » A coverage hole in NM auto insurance


Albuquerque Journal and its reporters are committed to telling the stories of our community.

• Do you have a question you want someone to try to answer for you? Do you have a bright spot you want to share?
   We want to hear from you. Please email yourstory@abqjournal.com

taboola desktop

1
Credit union is No. 1 large company in Top ...
ABQnews Seeker
Employees at Nusenda Credit Union say ... Employees at Nusenda Credit Union say they feel they are making a difference in the lives of members. The company, founded in 1936 as ...
2
Construction firm is No. 1 mid-size company in Top ...
ABQnews Seeker
Bradbury Stamm Construction, which has more ... Bradbury Stamm Construction, which has more than 150 employees in New Mexico and over 250 overall across two states, is a place that employees ...
3
New Mexico's Top Workplaces 2022: Full list
ABQnews Seeker
The Journal's 10th annual Top ... The Journal's 10th annual Top Workplaces program celebrates employers that are getting it right.
4
Home builder is No. 1 small company in Top ...
ABQnews Seeker
Abrazo Homes may be a newer ... Abrazo Homes may be a newer homebuilder for the New Mexico community, but the company's employees say it has already established a great team ...
5
Pâtisserie opens storefront location in Albuquerque
ABQnews Seeker
For the past two years, the ... For the past two years, the pastries of Blue Door Pâtisserie could be found displayed inside glass cases at Albuquerque’s Sawmill Market near Old ...
6
Financial services firm is No. 2 large company in ...
ABQnews Seeker
Q&A with Leean Kravitz, vice president ... Q&A with Leean Kravitz, vice president of governmental relations and regional co-site leader at Fidelity Investments
7
School is No. 2 mid-size employer in Top Workplaces ...
ABQnews Seeker
Q&A with Patricia Beecher, superintendent at ... Q&A with Patricia Beecher, superintendent at New Mexico School for the Blind and Visually Impaired.
8
School is No. 2 small employer in Top Workplaces ...
ABQnews Seeker
Q&A with Aldis Philipbar, development director ... Q&A with Aldis Philipbar, development director at Amy Biehl High School.
9
Electrical company is No. 3 large company in Top ...
ABQnews Seeker
B&D Industries is the No. 3 ... B&D Industries is the No. 3 large company in Top Workplaces for 2022.
10
Oil and gas firm is No. 3 mid-size company ...
ABQnews Seeker
Q&A with Ezra Yacob, CEO of ... Q&A with Ezra Yacob, CEO of EOG Resources ...