Splitting SE NM into 3 districts robs these voters of their voice - Albuquerque Journal

Splitting SE NM into 3 districts robs these voters of their voice

The very next day after Yvette Herrell’s strong victory in New Mexico’s Second Congressional District last November, House Speaker Brian Egolf, D-Santa Fe, told the media that this year’s redistricting process would be used to make Herrell’s district more difficult for her to win again.

The speaker’s comments were widely condemned, including by the Albuquerque Journal’s Editorial Board, who wrote, “Egolf’s statements ignore the value of a marketplace of ideas and a multiparty political system, and fail to recognize that 23% of New Mexico’s registered voters have no party affiliation.”

In response to widespread and valid concerns about partisan gerrymandering, the New Mexico Legislature established the Citizen’s Redistricting Committee during the past legislative session. The committee is a politically balanced group of New Mexico citizens with the mandate of proposing new legislative maps that are developed without regard to partisan affiliations, while protecting communities of interest throughout our state. The committee achieved that goal admirably with the initial concept maps they proposed recently, especially on the congressional level, where the basic cores of New Mexico’s three districts were kept largely intact in each of the seven draft maps.

Unfortunately, as the committee’s work has drawn to a close, we’ve seen exactly what Egolf meant by his gerrymander threat with the emergence of the so-called “People’s Map” by far-left activists to the New Mexico Citizen Redistricting Committee. This congressional map generated by a constellation of liberal organizations directly targets the Southeast portion of the state that we represent, splitting our community of interest into three different districts in order to rob us of the chance to have a voice in our federal elections. Much of Hobbs would be placed in the northern-based 3rd District, while Roswell is lumped in with Albuquerque in the 1st. Carlsbad and Artesia would remain in the 2nd District, separated from the other population centers in our region.

Despite countless statements and testimonies from citizens of southeastern New Mexico opposing this attempt to gerrymander our district, the committee unfortunately caved to pressure from the far left and included their map in their recommendations to the Legislature. That is a disappointing decision – and greatly brings into question the supposed nonpartisanship of this committee.

Our three counties – where we have the honor of serving as the chairs of our county commissions – are the very definition of a community of interest. Lea, Chaves and Eddy are the economic drivers of New Mexico, contributing more in tax revenue than any other part of the state and providing good-paying jobs to tens of thousands of hard-working New Mexicans in the energy industry. We deserve a continued seat at the table in our government, a fact acknowledged by long-standing precedent, as well as the new congressional maps initially released by the committee before this partisan “People’s Map” emerged.

This newly proposed congressional map would split up our region, with the blatant goal of denying our constituents the opportunity to have a voice representing us at the federal level. As chairs of the Lea, Chaves and Eddy commissions, we respectfully request the Citizen’s Redistricting Committee withdraw its recommendation, and reject this cynical and discriminatory attempt to gerrymander our state’s congressional districts to benefit one political party and remove the small amount of balance we currently have in our federal delegation. This so-called “People’s Map” in reality isolates and divides our people, and we believe our state deserves much better.

Home » Opinion » Splitting SE NM into 3 districts robs these voters of their voice


Albuquerque Journal and its reporters are committed to telling the stories of our community.

• Do you have a question you want someone to try to answer for you? Do you have a bright spot you want to share?
   We want to hear from you. Please email yourstory@abqjournal.com

taboola desktop

1
Lawmaker helped NM take first step to menstrual equity
From the newspaper
Reproductive health not a luxury; free ... Reproductive health not a luxury; free products make sense
2
BLM should prohibit venting and flaring
From the newspaper
Methane rule can help protect health ... Methane rule can help protect health and outdoor recreation economy in New Mexico
3
Lujan bill won't put pot ads on TV, radio ...
From the newspaper
Illegal marijuana poses greater risk than ... Illegal marijuana poses greater risk than regulated, legal weed
4
Jail needs oversight of an authority, not commissioners
From the newspaper
Experts are needed to make decisions ... Experts are needed to make decisions regarding the MDC
5
Solar cooling an option for our increasingly hot summers
From the newspaper
I went to the Solar Fiesta ... I went to the Solar Fiesta held in Albuquerque at the UNM campus June 24. I got to check out a fleet ...
6
Facing victims, not prison, will change you for better
From the newspaper
I am a student at CNM ... I am a student at CNM majoring in substance abuse counseling, and a member of the "Lived Exper ...
7
Keeping broken, outdated electronics out of landfills conserves resources, ...
From the newspaper
When you think of recycling, you ... When you think of recycling, you likely think of paper, plastic and cans, along with taking glass bo ...
8
Hydrogen can deliver good jobs and climate solutions for ...
From the newspaper
Last Sunday, New Mexico House Minority ... Last Sunday, New Mexico House Minority Leader Jim Townsend, a former energy executive, complained in ...
9
ABQ can take back its streets and park and ...
From the newspaper
The years-long surrender of Coronado Park ... The years-long surrender of Coronado Park to the crime and chaos of a large homeless camp has come t ...