EDITOR’S NOTE: The Albuquerque Journal continues its participation in a series of stories on the Colorado River as the 100th anniversary of the Colorado River Compact approaches.
PEACH SPRINGS, Ariz. – Garnett Querta slips on his work gloves as he shifts the big rig he is driving into park. Within seconds, he unrolls a hose and opens a hydrant, sending water flowing into one of the plastic tanks on the truck’s bed.
His timer is set for 5 minutes, 20 seconds – when the tank will be full and he’ll turn to the second one.
Water pulled from the ground here will be piped dozens of miles across rugged landscape to serve the roughly 700,000 tourists a year who visit the Grand Canyon on the Hualapai reservation in northwestern Arizona – the tribe’s main source of revenue.
Despite the Colorado River bordering more than 100 miles of Hualapai land in the canyon, the tribe cannot draw from it. Native American tribes in the Colorado River basin have inherent rights to the water, but the amount and access for a dozen tribes has not been fully resolved for decades.
The 1922 Colorado River Compact that divided water among states did not include a share for tribes. Now that the river is shrinking because of overuse, drought and human-caused climate change, tribes want the federal government to ensure that their interests are protected.
A water settlement pending in Congress would give the Hualapai Tribe the right to draw river water, plus $180 million to pipe it to tribal communities and the main tourist center at Grand Canyon West.
“It was the best of a bad deal,” said Phil Wisely, the tribe’s public services director. “And the thing is, I don’t think we could get a better deal, especially now.”
The Colorado River can no longer meet the needs of the 40 million people and $15 billion agriculture industry that depend on it. The U.S. Bureau of Reclamation recently announced that Arizona, Nevada and Mexico would see deeper cuts to their water supply in 2023. The agency also is asking seven Western states to find a way to conserve more.
Longstanding rights
The 29 tribes in the Colorado River basin are, in fact, among the river’s most senior water rights holders, a determination often tied to the date the federal government established a reservation. Tribal water rights – once fully resolved – could add up to about one-quarter of the river’s historic flow, according to the Water & Tribes Initiative.
Unlike other water users, tribes don’t lose access to water when they don’t use it. A 1908 U.S. Supreme Court decision known as the Winters Doctrine says tribes have the right to enough water to establish a permanent homeland. Often, tribes give up potentially huge water claims in exchange for an assured supply and federal funding to deliver it.
To the northeast of Hualapai, the Ute Indian Tribe has Colorado River tributaries flowing on its reservation east of Salt Lake City. While the tribe has secured some rights, not everyone agrees on how much more it should receive, delaying a settlement for decades.
Ute leaders say they’re tired of reiterating that the federal government needs to protect tribal interests.
“Until you start to deal with the inequities or the injustice, you can never really have any momentum going forward,” said Shaun Chapoose, chairman of the Ute Business Committee.
The situation of both the Hualapai and the Ute Indian Tribe highlights the frustration of Native American leaders across the basin that, though their rights may not be quantified, they are real.
Other tribes that have secured water rights have pitched in to help their neighbors amid the prolonged drought by conserving water in key reservoirs along the Colorado River.
But Jay Weiner, who represents tribes in water settlements, said it would be unjust to continue to rely heavily on tribes when they haven’t had access to the water as long as states have.
“The tribes have already front-loaded and sacrificed by the fact that the basin has been able to use huge amounts of water that tribes have rights to over the past 100 years,” Weiner said.
In a statement to the Associated Press, the Interior Department did not say how tribal water rights, which are federal rights, would be protected as the river’s flow decreases. It said it is working with tribes affected by drought.
Hauling water
Querta’s job is a grind, but he’s well-suited for it – analytical, quick and goal-oriented. He takes meticulous notes on water levels and quality as he fills tanks that ensure tourists at Grand Canyon West have water.
The truck takes a beating on the gravel and dirt road on multiple round trips of more than 30 miles most days. Querta keeps tools on hand for minor repairs. Major ones or illness can put him out of commission.
Once he’s filled the tanks on the truck bed, the water is sent through a pipeline from just outside Peach Springs to Grand Canyon West. The tourist center is crucial. Revenue from it funds tribal programs for the elderly, public works, the cultural center, scholarships and other social services. The main attraction is the Grand Canyon Skywalk – a horseshoe-shaped glass bridge that gives tourists a view of the Colorado River 4,000 feet below.
The tribe has long planned to expand Grand Canyon West with a store, a fire and police station, housing and an elementary school to serve tribal members who ride a shuttle up to a five-hour round-trip daily from the Peach Springs area to their jobs there.
But, without a secure source of water for Grand Canyon West, it won’t happen, said tribal Chairman Damon Clarke. Under the settlement pending in Congress, the tribe would be responsible for infrastructure to deliver water.
“One of the biggest things with our settlement is hope for the future and getting this not for us at this time, but for the generations ahead,” Clarke said.
One reason the Hualapai Tribe did not prioritize discussions on water rights long ago is that tribal members believed that water came with their land, said Rory Majenty, board chairman of the Grand Canyon Resort Corp. that oversees Grand Canyon West.
“We took things for granted,” he said. “Like you knew you were going to eat, you knew the sun was going to come up.”
The settlement has its critics, including Hualapai rancher Clay Bravo. He said the tribe should wait, negotiate a better deal and develop groundwater resources at the same time. He’s not satisfied with a lower priority water right that he equates to crumbs.
Even with secure water rights, tribes cannot always fully put the water to use because they lack infrastructure. A pipeline eventually will reach the southwestern portion of the Jicarilla Apache Nation in New Mexico through another tribe’s water settlement to boost economic development in the region.
Jicarilla Apache has leased water it already has access to for energy production, recreation and conservation, and to benefit threatened and endangered fish.
The Colorado River Indian Tribes, whose reservation sits along the river bordering Arizona and California, does not have the legal authority to lease its water, though a bill is pending in Congress to authorize it.
“It’s our sovereignty and beneficial rights of our water – the full beneficial rights of our water,” said tribal Chairwoman Amelia Flores. “We want to lease, we don’t want to sell our water, and that’s the difference.”
What is just?
The Ute Indian Tribe wants that same ability. The tribe asserts rights to 550,000 acre-feet. (An acre-foot is enough water to serve two to three U.S. households annually). A 30-year-old settlement recognizes about half of that.
“Utah’s position is that is the number we’re comfortable with, and we think that does more than enough to satisfy the claims of the Utes,” said Utah deputy state engineer Jared Manning.
But the tribe hasn’t ratified the settlement as it was presented in Congress. The Utes have sued in federal court over access to water.
A judge ruled in one case last year that the tribe waited too long to bring some of its claims against the federal government and Utah, but the case isn’t over.
Daniel McCool, professor emeritus at the University of Utah, said the larger question is whether the Ute Indian Tribe has been treated justly and whether funding for water diversions have been on par with non-Native American interests.
“There’s a reason why the tribe doesn’t have much water and why almost all the water in the region is being used by white people,” said McCool, who studies tribal water rights. “Look at who got the money, the Central Utah Project. Who got the water? Ask yourself that and ask, ‘does this look fair to you?’ ”
It’s a question tribal members have posed for decades, whether the first inhabitants of what’s now the U.S. should have anything but the oldest, most secure water rights. Inevitably, others will lose water they’ve grown accustomed to using as tribes gain access to it.
“The argument from the other side is that it is capitalism, free enterprise. That’s where they got us. Ownership is where it’s at. Until you have a piece of paper, it’s not yours,” Majenty said.
The Associated Press, Albuquerque Journal, The Colorado Sun, The Salt Lake Tribune, The Arizona Daily Star and The Nevada Independent are exploring the pressures on the Colorado River in 2022.
