Editorial: Wait, did we just spend $3.8M on 'trash' body cams? - Albuquerque Journal

Editorial: Wait, did we just spend $3.8M on ‘trash’ body cams?

New Bernalillo County Sheriff John Allen is having a serious case of buyer’s remorse on taxpayers’ behalf — a seven-figure case to be precise.

Allen says the $3.8 million, five-year contract with Utility Inc. — which included 310 BodyWorn cameras, plus uniform tailoring, vehicle cameras front and back, cruiser Wi-Fi hotspots, and holsters that activate the cameras when a firearm is drawn — is for “trash” technology. While former Sheriff Manuel Gonzales championed the cameras as the latest in tech and said his team conducted extensive research before settling on Utility, Allen’s administration says in practice:

• The microphones are affected by wind/area noise.

• There’s not enough memory to record more than seven hours, when the video is automatically “clipped.”

• Uploading takes a long time with good cell service/is impossible without good cell service.

• Once uploaded, the videos are inaccessible until processed by the company.

• There’s no easy way to share long videos with the media or others.

Allen adds he has staff investigating whether the department can get out of the contract and what better options are out there.

Gonzales had been resistant to adopting body cameras for years, despite law enforcement agencies across the nation making them standard equipment and the Albuquerque Police Department mandating them as part of reforms under a settlement agreement with the Department of Justice. He maintained for years there was no evidence they made for better policing and he had other budget priorities. He did not touch $1 million in startup money or $500,000 in recurring annual funds the county set aside for cameras in 2019.

That changed in 2020 when the N.M. Legislature required all law enforcement agencies be outfitted with body cameras. BCSO missed the September 2020 deadline; all deputies had the cameras in January 2021, according to Journal coverage at the time. Allen says the rush to comply resulted in a lack of due diligence: “I think the sheriff’s office … should have had body cams probably two years previous. Then the law came out and they were rushed, and I think that pushed people into the corner to get things done.” Gonzales did not answer a request for comment.

The public has to be asking “why are we years into a multimillion-dollar contract and only now finding out the audio on the cameras is often compromised and the video sits in the cloud for weeks on end?”

Hint for county officials: There is no good answer to that question.

Yet, Bernalillo County taxpayers — which include all Albuquerque taxpayers — deserve a real answer. And to know that, going forward, when their elected officials spend millions of dollars on public safety, it delivers for our deputies and our residents.

This editorial first appeared in the Albuquerque Journal. It was written by members of the editorial board and is unsigned as it represents the opinion of the newspaper rather than the writers.

Home » Opinion » Editorials » Editorial: Wait, did we just spend $3.8M on ‘trash’ body cams?

Insert Question Legislature form in Legis only stories




Albuquerque Journal and its reporters are committed to telling the stories of our community.

• Do you have a question you want someone to try to answer for you? Do you have a bright spot you want to share?
   We want to hear from you. Please email yourstory@abqjournal.com

taboola desktop

ABQjournal can get you answers in all pages

 

Questions about the Legislature?
Albuquerque Journal can get you answers
Email addresses are used solely for verification and to speed the verification process for repeat questioners.
1
Editorial: N.M. must take care when terminating DD Waiver ...
Editorials
From the Editorial Board: History shows ... From the Editorial Board: History shows New Mexico must be careful cutting off providers of services to those with developmental and intellectual disabilities.
2
Editorial: ShotSpotter needs to prove its $3.2M cost
Editorials
OPINION: Albuquerque ShotSpotter system needs data ... OPINION: Albuquerque ShotSpotter system needs data points to justify $3.2 million cost.
3
Editorial: BernCo taxpayers stuck with $7M error
Editorials
OPINION: BernCo's misuse of federal funds ... OPINION: BernCo's misuse of federal funds is going to unnecessarily cost taxpayers $7.1 million.
4
Editorial: APS must get a handle on guns ...
Editorials
From the Editorial Board: Growing problem ... From the Editorial Board: Growing problem of guns on campuses erodes confidence that APS schools are safe.
5
Editorial: County turns away 1 in 7 seeking detox, ...
Editorials
When Bernalillo County opened its first ... When Bernalillo County opened its first 24-hour crisis triage and treatment center in December 2019, ...
6
Editorial: Meaningful crime bills and tax reform need swift ...
Editorials
From the Editorial Board: Lawmakers have ... From the Editorial Board: Lawmakers have just hours to make bill adjustments to help make New Mexico safer, provide certainly for business and set ...
7
Editorial: Dear AG: Is ABQ getting turf bang for ...
Editorials
From the Editorial Board: Gladiators and ... From the Editorial Board: Gladiators and their artificial turf purchased by the city of Albuquerque need to return to the Duke City sooner rather ...
8
Editorial: Legislators have the chance to step up this ...
Editorials
From the Editorial Board: Lawmakers need ... From the Editorial Board: Lawmakers need to ensure your right to know isn't undermined by government entities who want to weaken our public records ...
9
Editorial: Lawmakers have a few more days to save ...
Editorials
From the Editorial Board: Lawmakers had ... From the Editorial Board: Lawmakers had better act fast to fix the state's Medical Malpractice Act or start looking for out-of-state providers for medical ...