And if you’re African-American – perhaps the only African-American male on an Amtrak car – with some cash on you, tag you’re it.
That’s roughly what happened to 22-year-old Joseph Rivers riding the train to Los Angeles in April, in his words, to pursue his dream of making a music video. DEA agents picked him out among passengers in a car to have a chat. Then they decided the $16,000 he was carrying – money he says he saved up to make the video – was somehow linked to drug trafficking.
Whatever probable cause or “hunch” they had, it wasn’t enough to arrest or to charge Rivers with a crime. But it was enough to confiscate his cash.
Rivers’ story, as told in a May 6 Journal UpFront column by Joline Gutierrez Krueger, went viral and got the attention of members of the U.S. House Judicial Committee, including Democratic New Mexico Rep. Michelle Lujan Grisham. Committee members want to know a lot more about why the money was seized and whether the agents were racial profiling when they targeted Rivers.
This is far from the first time this has happened in Albuquerque and elsewhere, and it’s time such questions are being asked.
Because being considered innocent until proven guilty is a pillar of American jurisprudence.
Because carrying cash isn’t a crime, even if it really isn’t the best way to move a nest egg when traveling.
And because riding an Amtrak train while black, with money in your bag, isn’t a crime.
The Justice Department should police its own DEA as aggressively as it polices other law enforcement agencies. And provide answers to these lawmakers’ concerns.
If they believe Rivers committed a crime, then charge him. If convicted, they can seize his money if it is related to the crime. Otherwise, leave him and his money alone.
This editorial first appeared in the Albuquerque Journal. It was written by members of the editorial board and is unsigned as it represents the opinion of the newspaper rather than the writers.