State's shoplifting laws handcuff retailers - Albuquerque Journal

State’s shoplifting laws handcuff retailers

The other day, I walked out of a hardware store without making a purchase because I couldn’t get a clerk to jacobsen_joel_BizOcome unlock the anti-theft hook from which the item I wanted was dangling. My petulance came cheap because I knew I could buy the same item at any number of other places, but it made me wonder how often anti-theft devices do double duty as anti-sales devices.

According to the 24th annual National Retail Security Survey, American retailers lost $16.7 billion to shoplifters in 2014. Since the study looked at inventory shrink, it apparently didn’t factor in the cost of anti-shoplifting devices – or lost sales to customers irritated by them.

Nor, apparently, did it include the cost of chunky tags on clothing, swiveling surveillance cameras and the hiring of loss-prevention specialists, those retail employees whose jobs have nothing to do with selling or customer satisfaction.

We’ve grown accustomed to the sight of uniformed guards standing sentry near store exits and patrolling the parking lot the way cowboys once rode the fence line. According to federal statistics, private security guards now outnumber certified law enforcement officers by a 3-2 margin. Security, in America, is increasingly a product to be purchased.

New Mexico law gives merchants a privilege to detain suspected shoplifters for the purpose of recovering stolen merchandise. But it’s not a privilege to be exercised lightly. It arises only if the merchant’s suspicions are reasonable, and requires that the detention be conducted “in a reasonable manner” and last only “a reasonable time.”

As always in the law, the appearance of the word “reasonable” signals a point of potential litigation. Unreasonableness at any stage not only nullifies the privilege, but can tip the detention over into the tort (and potentially even the crime) of false imprisonment.

And those aren’t the only risks of too-eager exercise of the shopkeeper’s privilege. Back in the 1990s, an $11 million verdict against Circle K established an important principle about shoplifting in New Mexico. If store policy encourages clerks to confront shoplifters, the store is responsible if the clerk gets hurt. For a small-business owner, that’s like betting the company on the outcome of a cage fight.

A recent case showed it’s not such a straightforward matter for police officers to respond to shoplifting calls, either.

By way of background, when the value of the merchandise stolen is less than $500, New Mexico law classifies shoplifting as a misdemeanor. Under the ancient common law we inherited from England, police officers may not arrest a suspect for a misdemeanor offense unless it’s committed in the officer’s presence. That’s called the misdemeanor arrest rule.

There was once a reason for the rule. There was once a reason for exhibiting executed criminals’ bodies in gibbets, too.

Shoplifting is common, but not in police officers’ presence. Realizing that strict application of the misdemeanor arrest rule would prohibit the arrest of most shoplifters, the Legislature crafted an exception. Under the statute, an officer may arrest a suspected shoplifter based on information from a merchant, regardless of the value of the goods.

Sounds clear in theory. But how does it work in practice?

Earnest Paananen found out when he stole a couple flashlights from Sportsmen’s Warehouse in Albuquerque. The store’s loss-prevention folks stopped him at the exit, brought him into an office and called the cops. When the officers arrived, they arrested him.

The question on appeal was whether the arrest was lawful. That might seem an easy question, given the statute. But, in 1994, our state Supreme Court said that arrests without a warrant – that is, without prior authorization from a judge – violated the state constitution unless compelled by “exigent circumstances.”

Curiously, no form of the word “exigent” actually appears in the New Mexico Constitution. It turns out this constitutional requirement isn’t actually required by the Constitution, but only by the Supreme Court’s decision. But, inside the legal world, that distinction doesn’t matter. For lawyers and lower-court judges, the words of the Supreme Court have greater authority than the words of the Constitution itself.

As to what “exigent circumstances” means, one old case said they arise when things get really crazy, as when the suspect is flushing evidence down the toilet or threatening the life of a hostage. Stealing two flashlights hardly counts under that standard. And so the Court of Appeals ruled that Paananen’s arrest, while supported by probable cause and authorized by statute, was nonetheless contrary to the Constitution, by which it meant the Supreme Court’s decision.

The court didn’t explain what the cops should have done with Paananen instead of arresting him. Realistically, though, they had just two alternatives. They could have detained him for the several hours necessary to obtain an arrest warrant from a judge. Of course, detaining him for that length of time would have amounted to an arrest by another name, making the whole exercise self-canceling. Or they could have turned him loose to try his luck at the store next door.

The fact that neither alternative would strike anyone as sensible didn’t matter to the Court of Appeals, whose job was to follow Supreme Court precedent, even when that meant disregarding the Legislature’s enactment.

In September, the Supreme Court reversed the Court of Appeals. While reaffirming that the requirement of exigent circumstances has indeed been grafted into the text of the Constitution, the court redefined the phrase nearly out of existence, explaining that “(a)n on-the-scene arrest supported by probable cause will usually supply the requisite exigency.”

Under this new standard, it is once again generally lawful for police officers to comply with the statute authorizing the arrest of shoplifters without a warrant.

Joel Jacobsen is an author and has recently retired from a 29-year legal career. If there are topics you would like to see covered in future columns, please write him at legal.column.tips@gmail.com.

 

Home » Business » Business Columns » State’s shoplifting laws handcuff retailers


Albuquerque Journal and its reporters are committed to telling the stories of our community.

• Do you have a question you want someone to try to answer for you? Do you have a bright spot you want to share?
   We want to hear from you. Please email yourstory@abqjournal.com

taboola desktop

1
Credit union is No. 1 large company in Top ...
ABQnews Seeker
Employees at Nusenda Credit Union say ... Employees at Nusenda Credit Union say they feel they are making a difference in the lives of members. The company, founded in 1936 as ...
2
Construction firm is No. 1 mid-size company in Top ...
ABQnews Seeker
Bradbury Stamm Construction, which has more ... Bradbury Stamm Construction, which has more than 150 employees in New Mexico and over 250 overall across two states, is a place that employees ...
3
New Mexico's Top Workplaces 2022: Full list
ABQnews Seeker
The Journal's 10th annual Top ... The Journal's 10th annual Top Workplaces program celebrates employers that are getting it right.
4
Home builder is No. 1 small company in Top ...
ABQnews Seeker
Abrazo Homes may be a newer ... Abrazo Homes may be a newer homebuilder for the New Mexico community, but the company's employees say it has already established a great team ...
5
Pâtisserie opens storefront location in Albuquerque
ABQnews Seeker
For the past two years, the ... For the past two years, the pastries of Blue Door Pâtisserie could be found displayed inside glass cases at Albuquerque’s Sawmill Market near Old ...
6
Financial services firm is No. 2 large company in ...
ABQnews Seeker
Q&A with Leean Kravitz, vice president ... Q&A with Leean Kravitz, vice president of governmental relations and regional co-site leader at Fidelity Investments
7
School is No. 2 mid-size employer in Top Workplaces ...
ABQnews Seeker
Q&A with Patricia Beecher, superintendent at ... Q&A with Patricia Beecher, superintendent at New Mexico School for the Blind and Visually Impaired.
8
School is No. 2 small employer in Top Workplaces ...
ABQnews Seeker
Q&A with Aldis Philipbar, development director ... Q&A with Aldis Philipbar, development director at Amy Biehl High School.
9
Electrical company is No. 3 large company in Top ...
ABQnews Seeker
B&D Industries is the No. 3 ... B&D Industries is the No. 3 large company in Top Workplaces for 2022.
10
Oil and gas firm is No. 3 mid-size company ...
ABQnews Seeker
Q&A with Ezra Yacob, CEO of ... Q&A with Ezra Yacob, CEO of EOG Resources ...