Editorial: Ditching arbitration clause won't benefit consumers - Albuquerque Journal

Editorial: Ditching arbitration clause won’t benefit consumers

Sounds like a good idea, but not so much when you dig deeper.

People who have complaints with banks that issue credit cards would be able to sue over disputes instead of going to arbitration under a proposed rule issued by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.

Consumers who didn’t read the fine print when they signed up for a card might think that being able to take the bank to court will benefit them. Probably not. The real beneficiaries would be trial lawyers who will aggressively recruit people to join class action lawsuits that typically don’t do much for members of the class but result in huge attorney fees for the lawyers. Ka-ching!

Most of you probably have received some kind of class action settlement proposal where you really don’t get anything but eye strain from reading print that’s even smaller than the fonts on your credit card statement.

And guess who will foot the bill for big awards against the banks over what most people would regard as minor transgressions – like not being clear enough that paying over time will result in higher interest charges? The consumers. Banks would simply pass along settlement costs and legal fees to fight the lawsuits to credit card holders and bank account owners.

The proposed rule change, which is in a 90-day public comment period, would cover new agreements for credit cards, auto loans, credit reports and even mobile phone services that provide third-party billing. Companies could still include arbitration clauses in contracts, but they would have to state they cannot be used to stop consumers from joining a class-action case. Not surprisingly, the banking industry is opposed to the rule, saying it could produce frivolous lawsuits and cost consumers in the long run. Banks and credit unions are expected to challenge it.

While the rule may be well-intentioned – it sounds democratic that people can take grievances to court – this would be a bad move for consumers and bankers.

And it’s not like there is no course of redress for consumers. They do have arbitration available, already can file complaints with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, and state attorney general’s offices have consumer protection divisions.

Of course, a simpler solution would be to just say no to credit cards and running up debt. What a novel idea.

This editorial first appeared in the Albuquerque Journal. It was written by members of the editorial board and is unsigned as it represents the opinion of the newspaper rather than the writers.

Home » Opinion » Editorials » Editorial: Ditching arbitration clause won’t benefit consumers


Albuquerque Journal and its reporters are committed to telling the stories of our community.

• Do you have a question you want someone to try to answer for you? Do you have a bright spot you want to share?
   We want to hear from you. Please email yourstory@abqjournal.com

taboola desktop

1
Editorial: Forest Service must take its missteps and health ...
Editorials
An 85-page U.S. Forest Service review ... An 85-page U.S. Forest Service review of the origins of the Hermits Peak Fire suggests the biggest w ...
2
Editorial: Vietnamese war baby an inspiring US ambassador
Editorials
Rio Rancho's Tina Diep is truly ... Rio Rancho's Tina Diep is truly a humanitarian ambassador. The daughter of a ...
3
Editorial: Diplomas need to mean students are ready for ...
Editorials
Algebra II may not be for ... Algebra II may not be for everyone, but practically every job these days requires some math, from pl ...
4
Editorial: What does fighting wildfires have to do with ...
Editorials
We're puzzled Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham ... We're puzzled Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham is using the wildfires raging across New Mexico as t ...
5
Editorial: Pot lawsuit shows need for federal-level clarity
Editorials
New Mexico medical insurers are in ... New Mexico medical insurers are in a Catch-22. On the one hand, marijuana remains ...
6
Editorial: Otero commissioners disregarded voters
Editorials
When it came time last week ... When it came time last week to put up or shut up, Otero County's three commissioners had no ca ...
7
Editorial: Credit where due for public servants rising to ...
Editorials
Solutions are, by definition, reactive. After ... Solutions are, by definition, reactive. After all, you can't have a solution without a problem ...
8
Editorial: Sanctioned encampments are supposed to clean up city, ...
Editorials
Sometimes the unvarnished truth just seeps ... Sometimes the unvarnished truth just seeps out. At a news conference Tuesday after ...
9
Editorial: Few independents bought NM's 'open primary' charade
Editorials
A new law touted as a ... A new law touted as a "baby step" toward open primaries actually turned out to be more o ...