High court denies rights of Natives - Albuquerque Journal

High court denies rights of Natives

June 13 of this year marked a milestone in constitutional law. Fifty years earlier, in 1966, the Supreme Court decided Miranda v. Arizona, requiring officers to notify individuals in police custody of their “Miranda rights,” including their right to a court-appointed lawyer if unable to afford one.

Although controversial at first, the Miranda decision has since become a standard safeguard against government overreaching in the investigation, interrogation and prosecution of alleged criminal conduct.

Thus, it is the height of irony that on the 50th anniversary of Miranda, the Supreme Court chose to issue a decision that guarantees fast-track prosecution of American Indians in federal court by denying them basic protections.

In United States v. Bryant, this nation’s highest court condoned the use of prior “uncounseled” tribal court convictions to charge and convict an Indian as a federal habitual domestic violence offender.

If you don’t know what “uncounseled” convictions are, that’s because they are generally unconstitutional if imprisonment is at stake. But in tribal court Native Americans are routinely tried, convicted and jailed without the assistance of counsel, something the Constitution forbids in state or federal court.

The Bryant decision creates a blatant disparity in the availability of legal protections against unfair and unjust prosecutions. While the Sixth Amendment right to counsel forbids the government from prosecuting and imprisoning non-Indians on the basis of prior uncounseled convictions obtained in state or federal court, Bryant gives federal prosecutors free rein to use uncounseled tribal court convictions to single out Indians for conviction and imprisonment.

At the core of the court’s reasoning is the fact Indian tribes, as sovereign nations predating the United States, are not restricted by the Bill of Rights and hence are not required to provide defendants with basic protections that are required in state and federal court.

While a separate federal statute – the 1968 Indian Civil Rights Act – mandated some protections in tribal court proceedings, the right to appointed counsel was specifically left out. Instead, Congress chose to provide the Indian only the right to obtain counsel “at his own expense,” for a sentence of up to a year in prison.

For many indigent Native Americans on impoverished reservations across the United States, this “right” is all but impossible to exercise.

Most disturbing is the court’s disregard of the racial inequity left in the wake of Bryant. Federal prosecutors are now licensed to target Indians – and only Indians – who faced prosecution without assistance of counsel in tribal court proceedings. This is because ICRA allows tribal courts to imprison Indians without the benefit of counsel but does not impact non-Indians, who are entitled to court-appointed counsel in state, federal, and now tribal court, thanks to a recent amendment to ICRA.

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who wrote Bryant, denigrates Indian people’s civil rights, citing the need to protect Native women from domestic violence. But Department of Justice statistics show most domestic violence perpetrators in Indian country are non-Indians, and the Bryant decision leaves intact their constitutional rights, including the right to appointed counsel.

Sovereign Indian nations suffer from centuries of oppressive policy imposed in the name of federal “plenary power.” Domestic violence is a scourge on all of our Native nations. But the solution cannot be at the expense of Indian people’s civil rights, by allowing the federal government to target Indians, as a class, for “easy” prosecution and imprisonment.

The Bryant decision is a wolf in sheep’s clothing. It pretends to respect tribal sovereignty and protect Indian women, but it does neither.

Instead, it joins the long list of Supreme Court decisions that expose Indians to the federal government’s intrusive power over Native people’s lives.

June 13 may have been a day to celebrate your Miranda rights. But for American Indians, it will now be a day to mourn the tragic loss of the most basic constitutional protection against unjust prosecution by the federal government.

Home » Opinion » Guest Columns » High court denies rights of Natives

Insert Question Legislature form in Legis only stories




Albuquerque Journal and its reporters are committed to telling the stories of our community.

• Do you have a question you want someone to try to answer for you? Do you have a bright spot you want to share?
   We want to hear from you. Please email yourstory@abqjournal.com

taboola desktop

ABQjournal can get you answers in all pages

 

Questions about the Legislature?
Albuquerque Journal can get you answers
Email addresses are used solely for verification and to speed the verification process for repeat questioners.
1
Doctors flee New Mexico – and more ...
ABQnews Seeker
The state's physician numbers are under ... The state's physician numbers are under national provider-to-population benchmarks
2
U.S. Fish and Wildlife counts, treats and gathers data ...
ABQnews Seeker
Annual count is part of federal ... Annual count is part of federal Wolf Recovery Plan
3
Untangling the policies and politics of New Mexico's medical ...
ABQnews Seeker
Legislature looking at changes to 2021 ... Legislature looking at changes to 2021 law designed to help doctors
4
Gov't transparency organization adds new members
ABQnews Seeker
Two local journalists join the New ... Two local journalists join the New Mexico Foundation for Open Government's board
5
Albuquerque to consider capping vacation rentals
ABQnews Seeker
Mayor Tim Keller's proposal stems from ... Mayor Tim Keller's proposal stems from the city's 'Housing Forward' initiative
6
SITE Santa Fe awarded National Endowment for the Arts ...
Arts
The grant will support the upcoming ... The grant will support the upcoming exhibition, 'Going With the Flow: Art, Actions and Western Waters,' opening on April 14.
7
Santa Fe student selected to magazine's Junior Council
Arts
Viviana Garcia-Vélez, 11, chosen out of ... Viviana Garcia-Vélez, 11, chosen out of hundreds of applicants by weekly youth news publication The Week Junior.
8
Xeric Garden Club to host lecture
Arts
The Xeric Garden Club of Albuquerque ... The Xeric Garden Club of Albuquerque will hosting Laurel Ladwig as she speaks on the topic 'Share Space with Wildlife with a Backyard Refuge.'
9
Boxing: Albuquerque's Torres gets hard-earned decision during 'Rumble at ...
Boxing/MMA
or, at least, did Saturday night ... or, at least, did Saturday night — from a right-handed stance to southpaw. It's not clear Josh Torres ever quite figured him out. No ...