Editorial: UNM athletics must put it all on the budget field - Albuquerque Journal

Editorial: UNM athletics must put it all on the budget field

“You cannot cut your way to prosperity.”

– Sen. John Arthur Smith, D-Deming, chairman of the Senate Finance Committee

One of New Mexico’s leading fiscal pragmatists, Smith would be the first to say you can’t tax your way there, either. When revenues are way down and expenditures are way up, you need to leave every budget-balancing option on the playing/paying field.

That’s true for the state of New Mexico, which has seen oil and gas revenues decline as Medicaid costs have ballooned – and just finished a special legislative session focusing on cuts and one-time account sweeps, not increasing revenues, leaving a projected $87.2 million deficit for the current budget year.

And it’s true for the University of New Mexico athletics department.

Athletics is facing a $1.5 million deficit for fiscal 2016, has not made its budget in seven of the past nine years, and is now technically in accumulated debt to the university for $4.3 million. That doesn’t include the additional $140,000 the department has to cut after the special session mandated a 5 percent reduction for all universities ($15.5 million at UNM).

UNM’s athletics budget is as upside down as the state’s, with ticket revenue projections falling short by $975,000 and fundraising goals by $200,000, while team operations cost and event/game management expenses are exceeding projections by $1.2 million.

UNM has some one-time payments to help the bottom line, including $900,000 for playing at Rutgers in September and a scheduled PIT naming rights payment of $600,000 from WisePies in December. But those alone won’t fix the problem.

Yes, UNM has tried to get “more people to football games.” Yet so far this season, despite beer and wine sales and stepped-up marketing efforts, attendance has not improved at University Stadium. It’s actually down from last year, and fewer than 20,000 fans showed up for the homecoming game against San Jose State.

The athletics department would love to raise student fees dedicated to athletics, and it is true that UNM’s are under $80 a semester for athletics and generate less than six other programs in the Mountain West Conference. (Raising student fees is a precarious foundation to balance a budget on, considering the arguments too many students are too poor to pick up more of their tuition as the lottery scholarship program careers toward insolvency, and are too poor to live on campus even if that greatly increases their chances of academic success.) Perhaps the students should be given a chance to vote on the issue.

And there is simply no way to fill that growing gap without considering cuts – UNM has 22 varsity sports, the second highest number in the conference, and 24 athletics department employees with base salaries over $100,000.

Athletics director Paul Krebs once famously said that “our funding needs to equal our expectations.” That’s a beautiful dream in a robust economy, but given the fiscal track record of the state, university and department, UNM athletics might be better advised to match its needs to its funding.

And that means putting everything on the budget field.

This editorial first appeared in the Albuquerque Journal. It was written by members of the editorial board and is unsigned as it represents the opinion of the newspaper rather than the writers.


Albuquerque Journal and its reporters are committed to telling the stories of our community.

• Do you have a question you want someone to try to answer for you? Do you have a bright spot you want to share?
   We want to hear from you. Please email yourstory@abqjournal.com

Nativo Sponsored Content

taboola desktop

MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS

1
Editorial: Study paves way for more NM wildlife crossings
Editorials
Kudos to N.M. wildlife and transportation ... Kudos to N.M. wildlife and transportation officials for converting a sizable data-gathering project ...
2
Editorial: APS should learn it's not above open records ...
Editorials
APS should learn it's not above ... APS should learn it's not above open records law
3
Editorial: Dow backed ethics commission - until it investigated ...
Editorials
Shortly after taking office in 2017, ... Shortly after taking office in 2017, state Rep. Rebecca Dow joined other House members in a 66-0 vot ...
4
Editorial: Game Commission should serve public, not be rubber ...
Editorials
The New Mexico Supreme Court is ... The New Mexico Supreme Court is expected to decide, once and for all, whether a 2017 state wildlife ...
5
Editorial: Tax cut and DOJ plans have merit; but ...
Editorials
Lewis' proposed ordinance would strike existing ... Lewis' proposed ordinance would strike existing mayoral authority to order the closure of ...
6
Editorial: MLK was more than his famous 'Dream' speech
Editorials
Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. was ... Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. was a master of the soaring rhetoric of the conscience. His most thought- ...
7
Editorial: Governor, lawmakers have opportunity to join forces and ...
Editorials
There's not a lot of talk ... There's not a lot of talk in Santa Fe these days about expunging criminal records. Or legalizi ...
8
Editorial: Election changes not ready for prime time
Editorials
Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham and Secretary ... Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham and Secretary of State Maggie Toulouse Oliver are using this upcoming le ...
9
Editorial: ABQ's taxpayers need accountability for homeless dollars
Editorials
HopeWorks owes it to its current ... HopeWorks owes it to its current and prospective clients, as well as city taxpayers, to get its paperwork in order and justify specific program ...